All Activity

https://btuatu.com/trangdangrb/shocking-reveal-tucker-carlson-secretly-drops-a-jaw-dropping-1000000-into-charlie-kirks-family-fund/

Our government is going to destroy our economy for no reason. It will make not one iota of difference to the temperature or climate of Australia.

Jacinta should tell Gina or Clive there's gold under Melbourne, where the tunnels are planned to run, and give the mining rights to them for the ground, and the tunnels will be dug for free!

None of the above are needed

Would you Prefer BLACKROCK OR a "DEAL" with TRUSTY TRUMP? Nev

When large amounts of money change hands, there are always strings attached. If China (or anyone else) hand over a big wad of cash, I expect there will be expectations of something to make it worthwhile for them to do so. Our exports to their country are not part of that deal.

You wouldn't have held down those Jobs IF you were. Dusty Crophopper was a Misfit. That was ME. Nev

Marty , HALF of the NATS think....? Now THAT IS News. AS for the Libs IF they aren't careful, they won't exist at all. Suss Ley is being undermined very effectively By Murdoch and her own Party. Nev

WE export a LOT to them and buy a lot from them Do you want THAT stopped? Trump would. Nev

TOO TROPPO. in Florida. Boston can be COLD. Nev

Jacinta Allen has obtained money from China for the Suburban Rail Loop, and is pushing for more money for another rail loop. Yes, public transport infrastructure is important, but selling our sovereignty to a possible enemy is not the way to go about it.

What did I miss?

Some people get weird when they get old. Not me, I've always been that way.

Jaysus, how much Wolfie have you had?? But having deciphered your post, I think the Nats and half of the Libs think it's a conspiracy theory, but anyone with a brain doesn't.

I was supposed to go to the US this week for work. I managed to get out of it thanks to the daughter starting university. I have lived in the US by proxy and it can be a great place, but, even 25 years ago now, when the country was more unified, it had deep seated problems caused by inequality and indifference. I will never forget the day I was accosted by deprived black people near Philadelphia railway station - they only wanted help. It was heart-breaking. I have also thought about living there, too. I will be visiting their shortly as a friend has sadly contracted/developed Parkinson's disease. If I had have moved there when first invited, I would have a decent percentage of a company doing very well.. life's missed opportunities, I guess. There are (or were) cities I had thought of moving to in the USA. Pittsburgh has long shed its grimy industrial image and is (or was) generally a clean, safe and family oriented city; Boston and a lot of the North East seems a great spot Bismarck in North Dakota appeals as well. Not much down south to think about..

So, how many people *think* the recently released report on clumsy change I'd a conspiracy theory and still want fossil fuels, even if they were 1/2 the cist of renewables? Do nothing and the cost is much higher.

Correct.

GOOD things USED to happen in the USA. NOW it's the Realm of the ULTRA rich. Stealers Not Builders. Nev

RICH Buys you the BEST Lawyers AND maybe the Best Judge if you really have the contracts. Most of the "REST of the WORLD" would be the SAME. IF you want to Know what's really going on "Follow the MONEY TRAIL" . Corruption exist where and when it CAN. Nev

Australia has a two tier justice system. If your rich or higher class a person you get ' favourable ' treatment front both the police & the court . It happens all the time . Drunk driving, gets a smaller fine ,plus a small suspension of licence. As seen on TV, A lower class worker will loose their licence, then their job . ( no transport ). Probably end up on the streets homeless. I personally know of two male drivers who ended up homeless due to loosing their driving licence. Only one was ,' alcohol ' related, the other fell asleep after double shift ! . spacesailor

AHEAD OF THE CURVE. Nev

Red, My post above was simply to correct what seems to have been a journalist's mistake, in saying that the preson had received a suspended sentence. Obviously the journalist has no knowledge of the initial stages of a prosecution after charging, and the laws by which a prosecution is carried out. One can readly imagine that the conditions of the bail would be such as to minimise the risk of further offending pending the completion of the prosecution process. The alleged offender might be considered to be a "disgusting crrep", but until convicted, the alleged offender is still considered innocent of the allegation under our system. The main reasons for refusing bail and requiring an alleged offender to remain in custody are the protection of the community - usually physical protection; prevention of further offending - drug dealers, and risk of flight. The first might not apply in this case, and no doubt the person's activities wuld be closely monitored. The third might no be considered applicable.

Correct.

You can watch the program on 7plus.com.au and make up your own mind, The disgusting creep should be locked up, not roaming the street near young kiddies.