All Activity

A White House Photographer Captured This Picture Of Trump In The Oval Office, And His Hair Looks...Interesting

F*ck him. A more useless bag of shit never drew breath.

From what I read, it wasn't reneweables that caused the issue, but they certainly didn't help the issue because there are no ruddy biug flywheels to take the load. There is a lot more to go wrong, as are a lot of technologies that advance. But, as thorughout technological development through history, somethinng goes wrong and we learn from it, adjust the design and move one. There are other ways to stabilise a grid than relying on spare capacity of conventional power stations. The reality is the generation side is changing and the transmission/distribution side has to adapt to meet the changes. That really depends on how the generation, transmission, and distirbution network is developed. I would say the generation plant is awfully expensive when it is not in use. However, due to the distributed nature of renewables, I find it poretty inconceivable using a mix of generation technologires, there would be no generation going one somehwere in a regional area. No sun, no wind at the same time over various microclimes probably happens. Batteries come in, and they can be distributed; there can be a place for a much smaller fossil or wood-burning generation networ. or nuclea to pick up the slack Also, remember, when a facility goes down, the total generation capability of that facility goes down - that is expensive. You can lose a panel/cell or an array of them, but the rest of the facility will still generate. When plants go down, and they do with alarming regularity, the cost is huge. In the nuclear days, if we could save a day of an outage, way abck then, it s was £1m/day saved. When you have the infrastructure there, yes, it is economic But, how much does, say, $650,0000 get you up and running fairly quickly with renewable generation? You can then say, yeah, but youhave to upgrade the grid.. Well, the grid is being upgraded anyway, but even with renewables, it is continually being upgraded, so grid upgrade costs aren't really relevant. But, lets say they are.. How much will your nuclear facilities cost. At last count, local facility here is up to USD$45bn projected and years late. Australia doesn't have the experience at nuclear builds.. TYhat buys an awful lot of generation for whatwe have experience in - renewables. I am not sure about Australia, but taxpayers money is used here to prrop up all generation so the consumer doesn't have to pay the full price of it. I am sure I read somewhere Australia does to. This is usually through tax credits, contracts for difference, guaranteed loans, low-interest givernment loans, grants and the like. So why shoudl renewables be excluded from the list? On that basis, yeah, I would be happy for out taxpayers funds supporting it (and I am in no way connected to the industry at all, anymore). In addition, the benefit of lowest CO2, even compared to whole of life nuclear, is good for the planet, as well as, in the case of nuclear, not having to have the cost of waste storage and maintenance, etc, which are rarely refleted in the costs of the CO2 equations. To me, the good it can doe far outweighs the need to subsidise it in its maturing stage. The UK is importing wood chips for two reasons. First, although I think it is a fallacy, to reduce emissions. In fact, per kw. coal prodices lower CO2 emissions because of its energy density, except in he theortetical perfectly managed forestry - which it isn't. But secondly, an on island 1/33 the size of Australia and with twice the population, it is hard to put caol plants too far away from anyone. The toxic pollutants emitted by caol, even considering scurbbing, and miles worse than wood burning pellets, so it is also an air-quality thing. The UK still has good quantities of mineable coal.. but it it still a silent and slow killer of many people with repiratory disorders. So, there is method in what you see as their madness. Again, this is point in time.. But, I agree that Germany was completely nuts to abandon its nucelar generation ihn the wake of Fukishima. I think towards thei end og Merkel's chancellorship, she became a little nuts. Germany have been talking about restarting their nulcear facilities as they were mothballed in generally very good condition. I am not sure what has come of it. The UK dilly-dallied for decades over its energy policy and it is paying for it now. France is predomionantly nuclear powered and has been investing in nuclear since god-knows when. When I last looked, all nuclear generation was, and i think still is owned by EDF. Although quoted on the French bourse, it is something like 90% owned by the French government. If it had to operate as a real company, and charge eelctricity at commercial rates like the rest of it, there would be another French revolution. And they stick dogmatically to their guns.. The EPRs they are building out are a lemon, but vive le France - they are too proud to change tac. But, these were original nuclear generators when renewables weren't what they are today. If Australia wants to go nuclear, it may pay to wait.. because there are billions being thrown at fusion. Yeah you get the radioactive waste (tritium), but you don't get the quantity, and there is no fallout, outside the containment area in the case of an accident as when you stop the reaction, the radiation stops.

It's a 2017 model. We bought it with 1,000 miles on the clock. We realised that its on condition service schedule was a joke, so I change the oil every 5k miles and service it every 10k miles regardless, and it has been a treat. The enterntainment/sat nav unit was flakey, but a software update developed by an independent maintenance company fixed it. Mini, like Bentley, is owned now by BMW, but still produced in the UK (Oxford, I think). It has great handling, and for the weight of the thing, is quite nippy in sport mode (which does make a decent different). If it get's written off, our funds are sapped a bit by the house, but will try and fins something from behind the sofa cushions to get one of their electric (not hybrid) ones. Though, it will take some time.

MRI's use a LOT of electricity. I use an electric toothbrush all the time. Its Great and recommended by My Dentist. I have an electric starter on all my cars and also My wife's Zero Turn Mower. Beware of reaching advanced years and becoming retarded.. and rambling on about all sorts of things. Nev

IF he Joined this Forum Most of US would be on a HIT List including IAN because it's HIS forum. Nev

I think BMW makes them. How old is it? Nev

Bridget Archer and Jacqui Lambie are good People. Nev

This one has been totally reliable.. but yes, the market decides. Still worth about £9k on the 2nd hand market

They are regarded as ( a bit unreliable) and the value is adjusted accordingly. The MARKET DECIDES. . Nev

Spillage is a weird term and would be Linked with accidental contamination which it IS NOT. ANY switching of a synchronous grid has to be done carefully. That is well understood. The Beating Heart has a rate 50 Hertz and if it contacts when the sine wave is opposite all hell will break loose. Phase balancing done Poorly is ALL wasted energy also. . On the B 727 Panel (a Synchronous bus system where ALL generators we connected together using a Constant Speed drive there was a Gauge reading electro regenerative values (back EMF) labelled KVAR's) Kilo Volt Amps Regenerative. The total output of the 3 Generators was reputed to be able to Power a Town of about 10,000 People. If a generator Misbehaved (OVER or UNDER volted) you could "disconnect the CSD" which could NOT be restored in flight and you had to be sure ESSENTIAL Power was selected to a Running Generator and Limit electrical Loads. This is all on the flight engineers Panel. Nev

Darn. I love that car

IF it's damaged to1/2 its market value it's usually written Off. Nev

As Smarty will attest the Population of Tassie is not very dense and some younger ones are leaving to get jobs on the BIG Island. Nev

Yep mini countryman

Both North Melbourne and Hawthorn play a handful of home games, usually at Universityof Tasmania Stadium. With a capacity of 17.5k, one can usually see plenty of empty seats at these games

Yep, Australia isn't Pakistan. The point I am making is the mount of spillage that is happening already in SA during high intermittent times and the amount of gas and coal(from Vic) that we are using when there is not much intermittent gen. The spillage is going to get worse as the amount of intermittent farms increase. Someone is going to have to pay for this. Have a look at how much the Max spot price for electricity has risen in the last 10 years. The price has gone from being variable with the demand to being volatile. This raises uncertainty with the retailers, so to cover themselves they bang the price up. https://wattclarity.com.au/other-resources/glossary/market-price-cap/

Mini by the looks of it

The AFL are generously giving the project a whole $15m, or around 1%. The taxpayer is providing the other 99%. Putting on my Nostradamus goggles, I predict that the AFL and any other private companies involved will see a return on investment, whereas all losses will be borne by the rest of us.

Yep and all the pacific islands were supposed to be under water by now. It is a serious situation, but Australia shutting itself down is going to make no difference. Maybe all these stop oil protesters need to head to China or India and blocking the roads over there to make some impact. China and India are pushing farwrd with NP as well as renewables. India is loading fuel into its first fast reactor. Fast reactors have the potential to use the long lived part of the spent fuel from light water reactors.https://theprint.in/science/india-is-building-a-500-mwe-reactor-thatll-breed-more-nuclear-fuel-that-itll-consume-how-it-works/2770409/ https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/fuel-loading-begins-at-indian-fast-breeder-reactor Bit of reading about importing woodchips to make electricty in UK https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/news/drax-subsidies/ https://ember-energy.org/latest-updates/the-uks-largest-single-source-of-co2-emissions-is-a-wood-burning-power-station/

Exactly. I travel on the train often, but those who drive their cars instead do benefit from all the travellers who are on the train and not clogging up the roads.

As I have said previously, I am not philosophically opposed to nuclear, but amongst other things, an economic case would need to be presented. The other issue is the timeline on nuclear. I get that SMRs are being developed and even a couple are in operation now (Russia and China). How long would it take for us to develop the expertise to build our own, or do we get in the queue to buy one from the Russians, the Chinese or the US?. Until these nuclear options are available and built do we spend money on refurbishing old coal or building new coal? All of the scenarios would result in bigger power bills. Your link that talks about a "death spiral" and lumps Australia in with Pakistan, I think, is inaccurate. Pakistan’s grid is in trouble because of long-term under-investment, big subsidies, high losses and widespread non-payment. That’s not a rooftop solar problem. Australia doesn’t have those structural issues, and we actually plan our grid developments years in advance through AEMO and the ISP. You did tell me I could not use Denmark as an example because Australia is not Denmark. You know what else it is not Australia? Pakistan And in fact, pretty much need to run 24 hours a day. Coal can be somewhat throttled back, you can't really stop burning fuel when demand is low. It is a bit like keeping your car idling in for when you need to go out. Would this be different with the cost of developing and building nuclear? The predictions of death spirals and the grid falling over are not new. I recall dire warnings that if we had more than 20% renerwables on the grid. The yardstick keeps being moved. When wll th grid fall over (other than the usual faults)? I dont say that all this is easy (neither is building NP) problems are being solved all the time. Just because we have relied on inertia from coal generators it does not mean that thius is the end point of technological development. We have more and more batteries and grid forming inverters, synchronous condensors etc.

What sort of car is that?. Nev

Those Victorian facilities are for Everyone's eventual Benefit. and are also an Infrastructural Necessity in a fast growing Place Like Melbourne is. Tassie has about the same Population as Geelong But you have to sail or fly to get there, which put's a COST on everyone going there and returning afterwards. Eric ABETZ is the Treasurer, A throw back from the DARK ages if ever there was One. They aren't LISTENING to the People who will be the ones stuck with this decision. The AFL won't come to the rescue.. Nev