All Activity

Any good He (Trump) does will be accidental. He only accepts a result Covering himself in GLORY. That would have to be FAKED. Nev

l'm not bothered for myself really , mainly just for our farmers and trucking . But eh, wouldn't take much notice of any price up and downs just yet, prob just his bs about the opening up. The Chump shyt show shall continue on for awhile yet though is my guess seems as 90% of it is bullshit and the opening was too atm.

They'd never do that.' For one, that could show be some sort of initiative, courage, investment and foresight from our Gov. But 2, it'd be helping our people . Couldn't have any of that stuff. PS, use to ran my old jackeroo on all sorts of cooking oils, even cleaned sump oils- prob not great that one l know. But man, some of the stuff l put in that poor thing, never complained once. Don't think we'd wanna try it with a modern diesel though , well yours maybe but not mine 😅 They'd like Canola ok though l'd imagine.

Bet you It won't. It should, though AND all the Other Illegal and reckless damage He's done, as well. Nev

Pity the next non-Republican Administration. They will cop the bill for restoring the East Wing.

A Vain Mans Erection. Nev

Your intention is clear, and source unreliable. Nev

Publishing someone else's OPINION? You should check your Legal Position on that, especially Under the topic Heading you Chose to use on a Public Forum. Nev

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese secured 100 million litres of diesel during his recent diplomatic mission to Asia. This amount, equivalent to approximately 570,000 barrels, was purchased from Brunei and South Korea using new federal fuel security powers underwritten by the government. While the Prime Minister also negotiated broader "no surprises" trade agreements with Malaysia and Singapore to ensure continued supply lines, the specific volume of oil confirmed as secured for immediate import was the 100 million litres of diesel. Opposition critics have noted that this quantity represents roughly one day's supply for Australia, given the nation's daily consumption of around 90 million litres. AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.

Plenty. Give credit where it's due. Prices are coming down. Things could have been a lot worse. Nev

Well, surprise surprise , should've caught todays news 1st before even bothering. Looks like they have another shytshow on their hands at the straight today.

According to an AI enquiry, as of 2024, Australia uses 1.14 million barrels of oil per day. How much did Albo secure with all his flying around Asia?

I think the concern raised in the video is about the risks posed by combining anthropomorphic weaponry with effective simpler machines like drones. Further, although they didn't mention it, there is the possibility that one deranged person could control them without worrying about disobeying 'illegal orders'. Or A.I. deciding that humans ARE the problem.

Heard yesterday there are more than 60 ships on their way to Aus right now. Surely that'll tie things over who knows how long frickin lot of oil. At any rate, our prices actually went down here last few days got diesel for 290 Sat. Dunno for how long but eh l'll take it.

Restricted, how? I clicked on it. It played. Perhaps restricted fron usa? They didn't say.

As usual, hard to tell what's true and what's not with the latest from yesterday and Chump announcing yet again they have a deal. Iran replied with a totally different story , again. Think l'd trust their words more than Chumps. At any rate , when ya think about it he needs to untangle this mess very very soon now. He'll need to get fuel and living costs down over there again and the people time to forget this bs before his midterm so he's gonna be wanting the shytshow done fast from here. Gonna be interesting.

Why bother developing anthropomorphic weapons when we have seen how effective simpler machines like drones have been in carrying the battle? Am I being over-cynical in thinking that by releasing a story such as the one above, the releasers are creating a diversion from what is really being developed?

The video itself says it's restricted. Good summary of what's happening. Scary times.

Even more sobering.... There are only 7k likes, and only 1k comments on this vid. I would have hoped for lots lots more concerned people watching & reacting. Unless the restriction mentioned (censorship) is so widespread that nobody is seeing it.

This is very chilling:

In the UK, if, when doing a reno, one finds any artefacts, they have to be reported to some government agency who will stop all work and arrange, at the land owner's expense, an archeological excavation. These are typically many thousands of pounds and take a few weeks. And builders also like to be paid for their enforced downtime . Thanksfully nothing was found for our stuff, but I know someone whose builder found something and his view was it had been laying there for at least a few hundred years and no-one knew about it; so it is no loss, that it waits anouther 100 years ir so before similar work would be done and it can be discovered. He argued that to the magistrate.. The magistrate wasn't amused. And he ended up being referred for a fine of about £20K from memory and an excavation was ordered, which was at his expense. He has no idea how the council became aaware of it; He is sure the builder didn't disclose it so it could have only been by one of his "friends". Thankfully, I didn't knwo anything about it until I read about it in the local rag at the time.

The stone axes are usually very easy to identify. They used to put a lot of time into smoothing them down to a sharp edge. Left fairly rough around the back end but the blade sides are usually very smooth and visually very obviously worked.

I once found what appeared to me to be a stone axe in an area where the type of stone did not exist. However theat type of stone did exist within a few kms of where I found the axe. I wonder if I had reported my find I would have put a stop to the real estate development that occures a few years later.

Are the votes cast in a particular polling place counted at that polling place and called in to a central tally room at teh closing of teh polling place? And then, are teh boxes containing those votes transported to the central tally room? If the boxes of actual ballot sheets are taken to the central tally room, who overlooked taking the boxes containing absentee ballot sheets to the central tally room as well? Looks to me like a simple case of human error. Sh!t happens. Fortunately the eror does not appear to have adversely affected the result in that electorate ( unless you didn't want One Nation to win).