Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/05/26 in all areas

  1. Interesting question. I could just wimp out and say, “I’m retired now.” Music has always evolved alongside technology. The instruments available to composers today are vastly different from those available centuries ago, whether in orchestras, jazz, rock, or electronic music. Of course, AI is a rather different innovation. I think AI in music is inevitable, and like most technological change, it will bring both benefits and drawbacks. On the positive side, AI is a democratiser. It allows almost anyone to experiment with composition, arranging, and production. That could open the door for talented people who may never have had formal training or industry connections. On the downside, it may also lead to an overwhelming amount of average material. Music has often evolved because composers and performers broke the rules of their time. AI, at least in its current form, largely works by analysing existing music and reproducing variations of it. Whether it can truly innovate in the human sense remains an open question. For me, music is deeply human. I would rather hear a second-rate live orchestra or band than a flawless recording of a world-class performer. The imperfections, the spontaneity, and the sense of shared experience matter. In some ways, this tension has existed for decades, as recordings became increasingly engineered and perfected. Technology has always reshaped the music industry. In the 1940s, venues employed large big bands with 20 or 30 musicians. The arrival of the electric guitar and amplified music made it economically attractive to hire four or five performers instead. That was a loss in one sense — the big band era was awesome, but it also helped create rock and pop music as we know it today. I suspect AI will become very useful in commercial areas of music. For example, we may not always need a human composer to create an advertising jingle or background track. My concern is whether this eventually leads to a kind of musical “fast food”, content that is efficient and disposable, but lacks depth, individuality, and genuine human expression. In the end, I don’t think AI will destroy music. But I do think it may change what we value in music, and perhaps make the human element even more important.
    4 points
  2. I sometimes think that bananaby's face is a reminder to take my hypertension medicine...... or put on more sunscreen. Anyone else wanting to Slip, slop, slap?
    3 points
  3. Here are a couple of pieces of music trivia. During war 2, the BBC would play the opening of Beethoven's 5th Symphony (which I think everyone would recognise) before news programs. The rhythm is short, short, short, long, which is the same as the Morse code for V. This became part of the V for victory campaign. Famously, Churchill used to hold up his fingers as a V but initially got it the wrong way round, which meant something quite different. The well-known theme tune to Mission Impossible, composed by Lalo Schifrin started out with that famous long, long, short, short, which is Morse code for MI
    2 points
  4. Although I love aviation, I find commercial air travel to be mind numbingly boring. There are however usually some moments of beauty. I snapped this last night on my way home from Adelaide.
    2 points
  5. The thing is that written music only gives you so much information. It is a l like a script for a play. Shakespeare wrote the words but different actors deliver those lines differently. For any classical piece of music you can find recordings by many different performers. If they were identical there would be no point in there being any more than one definitive recording. Composers also often leave a lot to the performer. Mozart for example did not generally use articulation marks (slurs, staccato etc) as most composers did preferring to let the performer use their own interpretation. There is also issues such as tone quality. My primary instrument is clarinet. It is capable of producing an edgy bright tone or a richer darker tone or a jazz tone
    2 points
  6. I mostly agree but are you confident you can identify AI music from human music?
    2 points
  7. I think that the question has been well and truely answered. By its very nature, AI can only utilise what already exists. As you can say, it can rearrange what exists, in the same way that composers have created variations on the works of others. However, it takes a human imagination to innovate. Here's an example. Pete Townsend of The Who played around with reverberation using an electric guitar. No AI program would have thought to do that. When he achieved a useable result, other rock guitarists began to use the technique.
    2 points
  8. Hey everyone, its TACO Tuesday! What's for dinner? Willit be TACO or NACHO?
    2 points
  9. Damn you Marty. Now I'm destined for nightmares.
    2 points
  10. Prime minister Pauline Hanson?! Is this the inevitable conclusion of our beleaguered democracy? | First Dog on the Moon https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/picture/2026/may/11/prime-minister-pauline-hanson-is-this-the-inevitable-conclusion-of-our-beleaguered-democracy?CMP=share_btn_url
    2 points
  11. Lately, His skin looks really terrible. Not just the Colour.. One Person in the Lower house is a long way from Having Pauline as the PM. Nev
    1 point
  12. I often listen the same way as you. Thank you ABC. But in spite of a score that was scribed by a famous composer, I dispute Maybe when I lapse into 'background noise' type of listening. But I might have three different CD's of a given piece of music that all have the same notes in the same order, but they all sound (feel) totally differen musically to me. Some people might have:- "Seeing colors for sounds is known as chromesthesia, a type of synesthesia where auditory stimuli trigger visual experiences, such as perceiving colors when hearing music or other sounds. " (from wiki)
    1 point
  13. OME if you did stream there is now Classic FM 2 which has no talking, just wall to wall music. I often listen to this overnight.
    1 point
  14. Therein lies my biggest worry. It doesn't (in my opinion). It does allow almost anyone.... to access one or two A.I. systems to do all that for them. Standardising, not creating. So far, I see that A.I. does not have the ability to innovate with original artistic input. No doubt it can research existing information and draw conclusions from that. Even when A.I. grows up more, will it ever be capable of mimicking human tangental creativity? (ie: creativity)
    1 point
  15. Looks like DJT is really going to visit Xi in China. I didn't think he would go. But he is taking his closest beneficiaries with him.... Donald Trump is accompanied by a notable delegation of top US executives during his trip to China. This includes Prominent CEOs:- Name Company Tim CookApple Elon MuskTesla Kelly Ortberg Boeing Jane Fraser Citigroup Others: Executives from Cisco, Meta, Micron, Qualcomm, Mastercard, Visa Impressive lobby list? Maybe don won't get a word in edgewise.
    1 point
  16. I listen to ABC Classical all day. (I can't get other radio stations and I don't stream. I just want background noise.) The presenters often go on about how wonderful some virtuoso plays a known piece. To my unsophisticated ear I can't detect any diffrence between players. To my way of thinking, a composer writes down what might be compared to a software program that will produce a sequence of sounds that is pleasing to the listener. Once that sequence is written, anyone with instrumental skills can reproduce those sounds, whether it be a virtuoso or a student. I suppose the difference would be in the number of flaws made in each performance.
    1 point
  17. I would say, though, that that is also what many composers do. You can take any modern song and find bits of older music in it. This is not necessarily bad; in fact, I think it is good. This is why music evolves rather than just making random jumps in all sorts of directions. The question is, will AI in the future be able to do this?
    1 point
  18. She draws Barnaby so well. That shade of purple is reserved for him.
    1 point
  19. Aaaah, if the lyrics are really A.I. it surely would have. Does this mean I have to disregard a 'song' that is nice, just because it might be presented by A.I. ? I disregard almost all video that accompanies music anyway. Do I have to go back to playing my old CD's that predate A.I. ? Octave, what is the destiny for musicians?
    1 point
  20. But we already have elevator music.
    0 points
  21. 0 points
  22. I went to visit my mum on Saturday and she had a YouTube video paused on her computer - something about a sniper taking a 600m shot. When I asked her about it she was telling me how interesting it was, this female sniper doing a 600m shot against the Taliban in Afghanistan recently. However, the woman on the screen and her male spotter looked like models, their olive drab clothes were WW2, their pistols looked like Glock butts with weird circular end on the slide, and the rifle had iron sights! Pure AI slop. God knows what it was telling her.
    0 points
This leaderboard is set to Melbourne/GMT+10:00
×
×
  • Create New...