Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/08/26 in all areas

  1. There's a bit of aggro going on between a couple of members. Hardly the sort of thing that makes for a pleasant place to come and interact with others. The aggro does not carry any of the discussion to a suitable resolve. In fact, it diminishes respect for those creating th aggro, and respecting others should be a foundational rule for we members. Let's make it the custom here to play the ball, not the man.
    2 points
  2. I’m basically saying don’t defend yourself by attacking the other person. Stick to defending your opinion and keep personal criticism out of it. That applies to both sides. Just stating the obvious really.
    2 points
  3. Maybe, but it's much better to defend your argument. Defending yourself usually doesn't end well for anyone.
    1 point
  4. The FACT that Trump swore not to start such overseas Wars/Adventures will Probably be the Most significant ACT in bringing his inevitable demise ON. Nev.
    1 point
  5. Not necessarily, but it helps if both sides can have a discussion without arguing and escalating differences of opinion or fact into personal criticism or ridicule.
    1 point
  6. Two different, but possible scenarios. However we don't need AI to put the financial or military structures at risk. We' got the orange A-hole creating the risk.
    1 point
  7. So the Iran invasion achieved its purpose.
    1 point
  8. And almost no coverage of the Epstein files outrage
    1 point
  9. I can live with losing respect as you have just taken pot shots at my character and not addressed the issue or the facts. What one thing have I hung my hat on? You said removal of the level crossings was necessary for road safety. The reality is, on the statistics. In terms of the pissing contest, you were saying, and I quote: as if that somehow means you know more about it than me... Nothing to do in your post was based on fact. The very definition of a pissing contest? As I said, I don't disagree that pulling them out; it is a great convenience to road users. That does not translate to road safety. But it cost a shed load of money and if the objective was road safety, the data does not stack up.. and if we are priortising lives, then it was a lie. The most deaths at level crossings in a year in Victoria was in financial year 2006/7 in which one accident in Kerang claimed 11 train passengers lives. Last time I looked, Kerang was not in Melbourne. Most railway crossing accidents in Victoria happen outside of Melbourne. According to Chat, by 30 June this year, $17.6 billion has been spent removing level crossings in Melbourne. I am hanging on what you said in terms of road safety and minimising deaths on the road was a bad waste of money. Traffic flow, yes, but road safety, no way. I would also argue improving road design, even with the level crossings in place could improve traffic flow. But that is just conjecture now.
    1 point
  10. There seems to be a largely diminished coverage in the Russia Ukraine war as well..
    1 point
  11. Wife: Have you seen the dog bowl? Husband: I didn't know he could.
    1 point
  12. Where there's a Will there's a bunch of squabbling relatives.
    1 point
  13. You have to hand it to short people..... They can't reach it themselves.
    1 point
  14. Some people don't get what a will is........ I mean, come on, it's a dead giveaway.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to Melbourne/GMT+10:00
×
×
  • Create New...