Admin

My daughter Caitlin didn't get that...the youth of today!!!

That's right, Dragnet...I knew I had heard it before many years ago but couldn't put my finger on it...thanks @red750

My daughter Caitlin is doing a module in her Batch of Criminology and Criminal Justice and laughed at the music used in one of her clips. I said I had heard that before somewhere but couldn't remember as it would have been many years agao. Does anyone know what the music is in this clip?

But their both no good when they get a puncture

Hmmm

Apparently Israel is on top of the education list, I think Australia has dropped down to about 18th now

[ATTACH]49265._xfImport[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH]49253._xfImport[/ATTACH]

What I am finding a lot these days when having friends over for dinner and other social gatherings is the discussions popping up on the whole female dominance movement that seems to be taking over the world at the moment. We have the MeToo movement, equal opportunity, and much more so much so that here in Australia irrespective of whether a male or female is suited to a job or not, many government entities are mandating an equal 50/50 employment of males and females. This includes Firefighters, you know people who run into burning building and carry adults out on their shoulders. I for one really hope that I don't find myself in a burning building and a female says to me "sorry I can't lift you so goodbye". Anyway, I decided to do some research on the very topic of irrespective of equal opportunity, what does the future hold for mankind, what is really needed in the macro sense for mankind to survive the future? Because an interesting fact is that the United Nations predict that the Earth can in its current state only support between 8 to 16 billion people, scientists believe that 10 billion is more likely the maximum the Earth can sustain (ref: HERE). With this in mind it is believed that by the end of the century we will have 11 billion people. This is greater than what scientists believe the Earth can sustain. So what do we do to reduce the number of people and give planet Earth a lot longer life yet still keep an acceptable population growth/turnover...Females are no longer needed in the world. Now I bet that gets a lot of people going Lets look at some facts why: 1. In the last 10 years there has been a 1,000% growth in male sex toy production (ref: HERE) 2. A Male is the only human type that can manufacture life (the manufacture of sperm) 3. Females do not manufacture life as they are born with eggs that come from around 7 million oocytes in a 16 to 20 week female fetus. This drops to a result of around 400 actual eggs at puberty. At 16-20 weeks gestation a legal abortion can still be performed and after the harvesting of those oocytes. (ref: HERE) 4. In 2010, an artificial womb (ovary) was developed that can mature harvested oocytes into viable eggs (ref: HERE) 5. It was once considered theory that Males could be implanted with a fertilised egg that would be attached to a blood supply in the abdomen and carry a fetus to full term and give birth via a cesarean however it was considered very risky in the old days. Now an artificial womb can be implanted into a male who can then easily give birth (ref: HERE) So, Males don't need to have sex with a female as they now have a vast variety of lifelike sex toys plus they can carry and give birth to male babies with the females fetuses being used purely as a source of oocytes and then the female fetus is terminated in under 20 weeks. See, females are not needed BUT Males are if civilisation is to continue. If this was implemented today, in 100 years the Earths population would drop, by just under what the Earth's total population is today, by at least 6 billion from what it was going to be making our planet more sustainable of continuing human life. Hey, don't shoot the messenger...these are just facts that often come up in conversations had in social gathering that have been brought about by the push for total domination by females of today

[ATTACH]49248._xfImport[/ATTACH]

Hear about the Irish Snow Board rider in the Korean winter olympics....started at the bottom and tried to go up the hill

You can see the tear marks from around her eyes

Even as a grown man I had to hold back tears reading this...I keep thinking of what the dog was going through every minute, waiting, hoping... [ATTACH]49068._xfImport[/ATTACH] A devastated dog has reportedly died of a broken heart after she was abandoned by her owner at an airport. The dog, who was called Nube Viajera — or “Wandering Cloud” — by the vets who treated her, spent a month wandering around the terminal at Colombia’s Palonegro airport waiting for her owner to come back. Initially hopeful, as well as healthy, the two-year-old dog spent her time sniffing people she passed in the terminal. But she eventually gave up any hope of finding her owner and heartbroken, cowered in a corner of the airport, the UK’s Mirror reported. Passengers and airport workers tried to offer the dog food but she refused to eat. Eventually, someone called an animal shelter but by then Nube Viajera was so malnourished she could barely stand. Despite being given food and medicine by vets, her physical and mental health deteriorated even further and she died, about a month after she was abandoned. Colombia’s Noticias RCN was told that the dog did not appear to be a stray. “The hypothesis we have is that a traveler abandoned it,” Alejandro Sotomonte Nino, a vet from the Colombian Animal Protection Foundation, said. “Apparently, during the first month that the dog was at the airport, it was going through the halls looking for someone, possibly the owner.” “That state of waiting deteriorated its health, to the point that she no longer received food.”

My comments are specific to Australia as that is the only country that I really care about...changing anything globally would send us around the bend

Asrgh...the good ol days lol

The whole question of gender balance at work is wrong. Many females choose to stay at home with the kids, bringing up the family and is a dominant female domain, citing that females can relate and look after kids better than males...also supported by the courts and society's general acceptance. This may add up to a certain percentage yet they don't deduct that percentage from the 50/50 balance. This results in more females being able to do what they want than males. Enough is enough with this whole equality thing and males should now start fighting back and stand up for themselves and stuff being so called politically correct

And then be allowed to marry her cat

Is that the one for left handed people

What is he holding?

In my opinion making drugs illegal has not worked all around the world, it just gills up our courts and the never get the top hand in the fight against drugs in any country. There are those that say drug addiction is a sickness and should be treated medically and with compassion along with counsellung and rehabilitation. There are also those that say many lights drugs should be decriminalised as a way to beat it. CRAP I think all drugs should be absolute illegal. We build some basic dirt hut type prisons in the middle of the outback. Any person that is found either with drugs or under the influence of drugs is sent to that prison without a court case for a first offence of 3 months. A 2nd offence 6 months and 3rd offence 2 years etc. In prison they get off the drugs by force and those prisons don't have TV, swimming pools, gyms, internet etc. Any person not born in Australia and found to have drugs on them, in their house, car or under the influence, any Australian rights are cancelled and they are sent back to their country of birth with just the shirt on their back to be dealt with and all their belongings in Australia are seized and sold off to offset the cost of the prisons. DONE Drug use will die, insurance rates will drop, assaults and murders will drop, there will be more police able to fight other crimes, burgularies will drop, road accidents will drop, more hospital beds to reduce waiting times, quicker ambulance response times and more and more and more. Give an initial 6 months moritorium first and then BANG drug users...you're GONE

No, the answer is 48 because you would have told him to get your own and when he comes back he would have had to get you another doz for the cheek of asking for yours in the first place

none because the others would fly away

My daughter just posted on facebook... Feeling confused my maths assignment questions are pretty much asking them like this: If sarah had 5 cookies and gave her brother 2, calculate the distance from here to the moon in mm

Windows, it's built in

Can't have everything unless you are in WA where Radars are legal