Litespeed

Stormy Daniels said on Tv, it's tiny and mushroom shaped. Also the worst sex of her life. In the trial she said he insisted "I spank him with a magazine that had his face on the front cover". Egotistical sociopath doesn't do him justice.

Which wouldn't be so bad if , first we didn't pay billions for millions in tech, and the bastards refuse to use lube. Worst Aussie citizens get the barb wire treatment when we visit them.

Where can I apply for a job as a fitter?

Exactly, but with a rolling review every five years- keeps it out of election cycle. It would need heavy powers and a public interest mandate. No members with any link to any major business or politics or lobbying of any business interests. It must have total powers of compulsion to testify, no immunity from prosecution on evidence provided and powers to demand prosecution of legal offences. Thus only a higher court could stop a case.. no more DPP or Attorney general decided on political reasons not to prosecute. This is essential as pollies love a cover-up and love to lie with immunity- they never harm their rich mates and media friends. Telecommunications programs including IT, web services used by any employee or contractor of the Government -all levels Fed, state and local must make it illegal to use any encryption program esp those that delete the messages/ text/data and it must all be archived by law. Such a law would be for any business or person involved in government, huge financial and mandatory minimum jail sentences would apply. It might sound tough but that gets rid of bullshit deals on sentences for their previous work as servants of the "people". Lots of fed offences are mandatory sentences. The current use of such programs are common amongst politicians and public servants, contractors etc. Their use is corruption plain and simple, it's used for secret deals, insider trading, to lie and obfuscate and game the system for profit. Also great to sell Intel to enemy or supposed friendly countries - aka spying/ treasonous behaviour. As a side issue it should also mean open contracts, except for limited redactions on only parts of military contracts. If the government enters a contract commercial confidentiality ceases to exist. If we can't read it and even most in government can't, it is a corruption of government process and immune from any review. If a company can't reveal its contract that's anticompetitive behaviour and corruption prone, so has no right to be a part of governments activities. We waste billions every year from such commercial in confidence bullshit and have wholesale dumped public services into the greedy hands of capitalist pirates. Lastly it should legally make the destruction of any documents held by any government departments, political party offices and offices of politicians a criminal offence, esp the Prime minister's department. This is both for the person who destroys it, allows it to be destroyed or orders such destruction, or is aware of destruction taking place and does not immediately stop it. Make it a heavy mandatory sentence. Currently each election the loser shreds everything and even has departments clear the decks of any problem areas. The only reason is to cover-up misconduct in office and corrupt the system. Just a few quick thoughts towards a better society. I have to go sort out some crap going on in the middle East and a bloody strong coffee.

Your phone is not Anonymous in Australia at all. The gov and telcos know exactly who you are and where if needed. That's a good thing, the only need for anonymous phones is criminals and spies. Spams don't care who you are that much , they target numbers.

I am having a lovely Italian vintage with hints of malt and hops. Peroni the one and only.

I also know up to 200mph it goes like a supercar then it goes from 200 to 600mph in about 15 seconds That's serious g fellas. It's also rear wheel steered.

OME, The exact same could be said of police motorbikes, they need refilling just like IC cars do. And breaks to pee are needed plus coffee, donuts etc. The new fast charge cars can do 10-80% in 10 to 15 minutes. I don't see it as a issue esp given the regen ability actually suits the highway patrol model well.

Definately better in the medium and long term. Intially it would shock and outrage people with the reality of the world we live in, but most seem shocked and outraged anyway esp those that only narrow cast views they agree with. The world would be a very different place and much better for it. As far as anonymous goes, we should be allowed to express ourselves but be responsible for what we say and the actions they cause. A moniker is Ok but the government and courts should be able to access your info. Naturally this has big risks in dictatorships esp China, Russia etc. but they would collapse in a world of truthful politicians. The web titans must be considered publishers and not immune from laws, as in the USA, where they have special legislation making them immune. If they don't get taxed they have no right to exist and profit from a countries people. You can argue they just publish and advertise from another country, but any smart politicians could easily stop that, VPN use or not. Just make it illegal for any web provider to transmit their platform and illegal to buy advertising for any Au operating company and those selling into Australia on the banned platform. Any transaction on the platform would be considered illegal and like money laundering. Treat the buggers like organised crime until they obey with our countries laws. Naturally all top executives of the platform would be liable for jail if they break these rules and fines for the company of 3 times gross sales. Here is the kicker, call it the ""Musk law", the majority shareholder or majority voting rights shareholder is legal liable for any fines or law suits the company can't meet. That stops the pyramiding of companies. As far as moderation goes, needs to be fast and human based not just AI, and should be done by separate arms of the platform with a guaranteed high funding level and a separate independent board. Failure to immediately takedown after a order to do so by the regulator should be $1,000 per view, that adds up very quickly. 1 million views is $ 1 billion in fines, also delete any cross posting of the offending post/video/misinformation. Their business model would collapse or change to be legal. I expect Elon Musk would wait until we fine him $100 billion but that's fine, we could be part owners in SpaceX. Suddenly taxes would be paid, misinformation would be rare and easily debunked, and elections wouldn't be interfered with by tech billionaires, foreign governments ie Russia, China. Think how nice our world would be. The truthful pollies is a pipe dream but the changes to the web are realistic.

We use to call them Tramp stamps. No my liking but each to their own. What I really dislike is coppers covered in tatts, beards are ok but not tatts. Hard to tell from jail gronks and Bikie gangs.

So 24hr security? Easy, book him a room at Guantanamo.

I think specific cases should be discussed to provide context and real world experience. Just create pseudonyms for names.

Not just AFL but Rugby ( thugby for private schools) and the NRL. All condone and promote violence that is beyond the rules

So in that case would you arrest the offending player? What about stomping on the head? Or punching a player or spectator?

And that is the issue at heart. If it's a obvious assault rather than a play incident the player should be immediately arrested. Just like in any aspect of life. The pitch is not invaded no more than officers entering any public property to effect arrest. To imply pitch invasion is to make the pitch sacrosanct. A immediate arrest says to society the rule of law is sacrosanct and violent assault is always a police matter. Is their any other place in society where a violent assault in front of public and police would not result in immediate arrest? No. It is irrelevant if the sport has sanctions at a later date, they are a employer not the State. Any penalty should be a matter for the courts, any sanction from the sport should be irrelevant to the case. We don't let armed robbers off because they got punished by their employer. A society that lets open violence in sport be televised and police condone it as "sport" breeds violent culture.

I'd say probably real. Americans aren't real big on puns or humour in their news. Sarcasm and wit are rare commodity for most of them.

I like the idea of sport but not violent tribalism which all the football codes seem to not just suffer from but actively promote. The most dangerous ball sport is cricket but also the best behaved players and spectators. That ball can and will kill you, but the players won't. And I hate the bullshit Anzac footy matches. They should not be hanging of soldiers bootstraps and made out as sport heros.

Part of the problem I agree is violence in sport been accepted. If you purposely harm someone in sport it should be a criminal charge just like off the field. Why have a magic field where laws don't apply? That attitude flows off the field and is very apparent in player behaviour off field and by supporters. The next time a player has a "brain snap" call it for it's true form, a idiot who can't control been violent and should immediately be charged and arrested on field by the police who are attending. If that was the norm, culture would change. Also the teams should be charged under workplace safety laws, they encourage a unsafe work environment and guys get permanent injuries. If you train players boxing you are responsible when they punch on. Any cop who won't charge a violent player immediately is basically a coward and should hand in their badge, they are a big part of the problem. I can hear the outrage, but it's their job. The violence unsanctioned means it is acceptable when clearly it is not legal nor moral.

Genuine Pecker is the prick from the National Enquirer who bought stories for Trump to stop scandals

Real burgers have a big half pound of proper mince pattie made fresh that day. My local ones are huge and rarely can I finish one. I swear they are trying to fatten me up.

Looks like a small glow bait for fishing

Bondi poo bergs or Bondi floater

After your driver's launch into unstable orbit at Lemans not once or twice but three times? Aero instability was always a design issue and the first crash proved it. Even superman can't out drive being launch over a rise at 300+and you loose downforce and the air sucks the front of the car into the air. Now it's a airfoil and the car is suddenly airborne and flipping backwards at 300 +......faaarrk Amazing crash safety but it's not if but how soon you crash.

Even at that age Freddy loved a dress.

You mean the Mad Monk