Well, no, not really. What is means is that some of us like to see evidence, rather than blindly believe what some psychologically suspect people tell us. You like to see real statistics, and real results, you frequently bring these things up, when talking regulating stuff, why shouldn't the same degree of proof be required for something that's supposed to be so important?
I read a joke recently, which has a lot of truth to it.....
Does anyone see the irony of Christians claiming to abhor gambling, then bet their whole life on there being a god and an afterlife?
Not believing in a god, doesn't mean you don't believe in anything.