Jerry_Atrick

Well, she swaped out two instructors - the first two having what could be best described as personality traits not reallu suited to teaching people, but daughter passed her driving test yesterday. First attempt with whom her current instructor thinks is the toughest examiner and no deductions - i.e. a perfect score! As I welcomed her to eternal poverty, I realised it is our cost of living going up! As she starts university in September and over here many universities, including the one she is going to, require first year students to live in on-site accomodation, it doesn't make sense for her to get a car, yet. But at the moment, she works 16 miles away. To date, parents have been driving her to work and picking her up 4 days a week, which is 256 miles a week. She will now driver herself to and from work using the mini (she won't drive the Volvo), so that should reduce the mileage to 128 miles a week. Happy daze, right! Well,, er.. no... So, we have to get her insured. Insurance here is more of a scam than Australia. As my partner doesn't drive much except to take daughter to work, we legally cannot put my daughter as a nominated but not main driver of the car. Our insurer doesn't insure higher risk drivers (i.e. youn-uns). so we had to cancel the policy we just renewed (with a cancellation fee) and take out a new one, where my daughter is the main driver and both partner and I are named drivers. Previous insurance bill: £380. New one (after significant time shopping around), £1800. TThe average quote was £4,000, and we had one come in at a reasonable £10,000 (the car is valued at £9,000). With this, my daughter has to drive with an app on her phone and paired to a tracker that makes sure she complies with all the rules (which no one normally does). But, because my daughter will need to drive to work and partner doesn't want to give her a lift when I am in London, I now have to take the Volvo. The fuel usage is only marginally more than the Mini as the former is diesel and the latter petrol and both have the aerodynamics of the side of a garage, but, the Volvo is not ULEZ compliant - which means add £25 pre week for the privilege of driving to the train station and back, of a little over £100/month.. or £1,200/year. Not only that, but to preserve my partner's no claims bonus, I have to make my partner the main driver on the Volvo insurance! Which means, unless I get another vehicle, I will lose my no claims history after three months - one month before my daughter hands us back the keys and heads off to to uni. So far, I am about £300/month worse off.. At least my daughter may pick up the tab for the petrool she uses now.. and she will also buy her own lunch (when muggins here drover her to work, we woiud stop and the local supermarket so she could buy her lunch - except I would pay for it). Still, wouldn't want it any other way!

Still considered the best grand final ever, look at what happens to "Dermie" on the first bounce:

Here's the article: https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/i-just-can-t-put-on-shoes-and-socks-dermott-brereton-s-crippling-legacy-20250606-p5m5ig.html And he says we would do it again, but go harder.. Definitely one in a million that attracted a lot of heat

Must have been a javascript error.. I closed the browser down as the submit button didn't seem to be working after a few clicks

How? The world is crying for leaders that lead.. not follow

Not only te USA for some of this:

BODMAS (something like it)...

Sadly, it is an expensive undertaking and if you lose, you pay the other person's costs (depending on any contributory factors of the other person).

I read or saw a TV/YT segment that in the Truth Social comments, most, if not all of the MAGA mob were backing usk, especially over the debt levels. However, I think Musk may be playing the issue poorly, because he is coming across as whiney, and also has as much as had his investment in political donations isn't paying off (used words like Chump has shown ingratitude when considering how I [Musk] had donated). For the day/swing trader in Tesla.. if he couldn't see the writing on the wall and got out or at least went short of TSLA the day, or shortly after Chump did his Tesla promotion stunt, or at least when the spat started by Musk (rightly) criticising the bill... as there was only one wau thay was goign to end, and it was pretty predictable what short term inpact it woud have in TSLA share prices. I am guessing he bought and drank the Kool-Aid on TSLA - maybe himself a MAGA maniac. Re the claim of Epstien files.. well, everyone is saying without proof, as if Chump has normally proffered proof for almost every claim he has made. In anycase, I may be missing something, but as far as I can see, the only proof would be to present the documents. And as they are as yet under wraps, he would be putting himself in a precarious position if he released them. My guess is the justice department wouldn't be as tiptoey to prosecute Musk as they were Chump especially as the senior court system is more or less captive to Chump.

My take on it is that a 2015 Telsa is likely to give you issues with build quality more than the battery itself. But, yes, battery technology has moved forward from 10 years ago. But, like any other car, you can check it yourself, or get a pre-purchase inspection of the battery.. though it would be at a dealer: https://www.racv.com.au/royalauto/transport/electric-vehicles/buying-a-second-hand-electric-car.html The good think about a high mileage EV is that they suffer less vibration than an ICE car, so other biths that tend to fall off don't, and of course, there is simply less to go wrong with an EV anyway. A nice last car can be an EV... a lemon of a last car can be an ICE. There are still cars that have faults in their engine design and build leading to recalls.. Buy a second hand one of those where the dealer no longer supports the recall/warranty, and you're as SOL as if a BEV battery dies.. And the costs to fix/replace can be the same as a new battery. When you consider how mature the ICE engine technology is, and the body of knowledge built up over more than 100 years, it is a little damning on how bad that technology really is that there are still basic design and build flaws. (SOL is 'Merican speak for ship out of luck).

128

Ai was well underway in Covid times This is a question of contract and possibly employment law

Sky in the UK was divested by the merde-docs many years ago. SKy news in the UK is probably on the reasonable scale in terms of integrity.. it still pushes an agenda, much like many MSM publications, but is in no way a Sky News in Australia. GB News, on the other had, was created to be a Sky News Australia type station - poor mans version of Fox News. Apparently, it isn't doing terribly well. Although it is framed as AI, I see this as sort of a question of contract. The lady contracted (presumably as a limited company) to a company to provide her voice. The terms of the contract would have to be looked at to determine if it gave the buyer unlimited use of her voice (not just the words she spoke). Although, it does raise an interesting point - what would be a reasonable use of her voice, even if the contract said the company had purchased rights to uer her voice as they pleased. Contrary to common perception, contract law isn't only what is written on the contract, and all sorts of terms and restrictions are implied by the courts for a fair outcome given the nature of the contract itself; and clauses have been struck out. If the signed a contract as a limited company (pty ltd in Australia), then it is harder to have terms implied or clauses struck out except if they are illegal. However, if she signed as a private person/sole proprietor, she will be in a much better position and she should go to civil proceedings. My recommendation to her would be to either have the reuse term restricted, or an implied royalty term appolied so she makes money out of it.

Looks like the bromance is well and truly over: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/03/elon-musk-trump-tax-bill-disgusting-abomination

Musk in the bad books because he called the tarriffs policy nuts (or words to that effect). He has (or is) leaving DOGE more looking like a DOGE-bag than anythign successful. Despite his claims of saving the govenment something like $176bn (of a promised many trillions), the real "savings" are estimated to tbe well below a billion, and that doesn't cover the cost of the damage down outside the agency and the cost of cleaning it all up. All in all, it looks like a toddler had a tandtrum in their play-pen. Having said, that, he is about to float his AI business and is seeking a $113bn valuation of X.Ai.

https://www.businesstoday.in/technology/news/story/tech-layoffs-2025-ibm-lays-off-8000-employees-as-ai-replaces-hr-department-478053-2025-05-28

I would think these days, they prefer 5s, 10s, and 20s

And take wheelbarrows to shovel it out...

Hmmm.... for once, their propaganda machine isn't lying...

I think Nev means within his own supporter base as well... Except for the magamanaics, of course.

Right thread this time: Posted 44 minutes ago I have a 2013 XC90 Diesel.. 2.2l rated at 225bhp when new. We purchased it 1 year old with 10k miles on the clock. It now has 150,000 miles. This was the last of the old shape. They had a reputation for not great build quality, and there have been a few cosmetic issues with it. Within warranty it threw a turbo gate (waste) valve, which was covered under warranty. Other than that, it has had a bearing in the altnerator go, which was £30 for the bearing and £280 for labour at a local independent.. There was a problem with a prop shaft, but the local independent fella tweaked it for naught and it has run fine since. It does fo through tyres, though... Worked out to use Michelens that are all season and they hold up well.. Fuel economy for such a heavy car is pretty good - averages around 30mpg on the motorway, whihch was admittedly most of its driving. Since the ULEZ charge was implemented across the wider London area, I don't drive it anywhere near as much, still love it.

The next thing they could do is get rid of $1 & $2 bills.. I havebn't been to the US in over twent years a\nd even back then, your wallet was stuffed with stuff that was pretty worthless.

Looks like Vlad is going to have to order a few more planes: https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/ukraine-destroys-11b-worth-of-russian-bombers-in-surprise-drone-attack-20250602-p5m418.html And not behind a paywall: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/01/ukraine-launches-major-drone-attack-on-russian-bombers-security-official-says