old man emu

Does that mean that ON can quickly adapt its policies to changing circumstances?

Rule No. 1 for safe driving: Keep your eyes outside the vehicle. That doesn't simply mean looking a car length ahead. It means looking as far as the eye can see In that 120 degree arc in front of you. You should not divert your eyes from that view ino the vehicle for more than a split second. That's why it is safer design to place controls where muscle memory lets us find them. A driver should not have to seek visual clues to locate and operate controls while operating the vehicle.

OK. The Party Abbott was fighting was the Labor Party. Just ignore that for a moment as I concentrate on what I want to say. It seems Abbott's sole aim was to gain power. He was elected to provide good governance to the Nation. That was more important than going for Power for Power's sake. He might have got the top job if he had won, but where would that leave the Common people? No better off.

How many of us are right-handed? Cars are designed for countries which drive on the left right side. That means that dashboard layouts are suited to a driver who has controls accessible by the right hand. Here, that same dashboard layout is on most people's left hand side. Those people aren't used to doing accurate things with their left hand.

The problem with fitting all sorts of electronic whizz-bags to cars is that when the whizz goess bang, the car stops working. I can see the benefit of a GPS, but with a small screel, not a dash-wide screen that could be used to watch a Cinemascope epic. I remember when portable DVD players arrived. It was illegal to have one in a vehicle within the view of the driver.

So. The LNP has intimted that it is willing to form a coalition with ON. Not in an atempt to provide good governance, but for the stated aim of "getting Albo out of The Lodge". I bet that would Make Australia Great Again.

Perhaps it is becasue people think that the system is out of control. There are so many thngs impacting on us that cannot be controlled by ourselves, or by politicians. People must be thinking that since the place is going to Hell in a handbasket, it must be the fault of our traditional leaders from both sides. Therefore they decide to give the non-traditional a go.

A circuit breaker is a very important thing in a circuit, but it doesn't do the work the circuit is meant to do.

Thanks for bringing me up to date.

It used to be that Americans held their President in the highest regard and showed the greatest of respect. Trump has caused those things to be abandoned. He's attending a basketball Grand Final in New York, and instead of being cheered by one and all, he is being booed unanamously. We all love sport grand finals. By deciding to attend this one, Trump has prevented thousands of fans from enjoying the experience. The comom fan has been barred from going near the venue, or to participate in the parties that are part and parcel of the event. It's probably made worse by the fact that the New York team hasn't been in these finals for years. A lot of us know what it feels like when your underdog team finally makes it to the top. To paraphrase England's King Henry II, "Who will rid us of this turbulent pest?"

Who says that it can't happen again? Ther power was always there in the Constitution, it just wasn't used before. That's the reason we have out Head of State as we do.

A government in the current political climate is fighting battles on many fronts. Its first duty is to provide wise governance. To do that it has to deal with a global economy that is shivering with fright because of the actions of the USA. That means it has to deal with cost-of-living. It also has to deal with what people are saying about the causes. One of those that people are saying is immigration. It would be a very brave government that shut the doors to immigration. I could list a whole heap of reasons, but you can fill the list from your own experiences. The next battle is dealing with how it responds to the murmerings of disquiet the people are making. It is clear to see why ON is proving popular. It provides an outlet for complaining. The unfortunate thing that I see is that ON has no documented policies. Also, the candidates it puts up have no experience in governing. The other three major Parties at least have that experience. The way I see it, if ON won government, we would end up in a pretty poor position. The question is: would the Govenor-General dismiss a ON government?

I remember the HD being called the Holden Disaster, and the HR the Holden Revenge.

Ramseet??? I thought you meant Ramjet. I wanted o post this video as a bit of a joke, but as I listened to the song, I realised how American kids of the Boomer generation were being subjected to jingoistic propaganda.

I'm doing a lot of thinking about the Hereafter. I go to a cupboard and think, "What am I here after?"