old man emu

This is an interesting video.

Any "rock from space" is unconsolidated material from the formation of our solar system. It has to be 4.06 billion year old. Such a rock simply cannot be only 2 million years old. Did the video have the commonly heard narrator? Just another bit of AI-created clickbait it is did.

Consider yourself lucky that you do have rain. The paddocks around my place are bare because there has been no useful rain. Downpours from storm cells don't cut it. I'm lucky that I have a bore for a regular water supply, and a small rainwater storage for drinking water. A neighbour has just had to truck in water for domestic use.

Trumps social media postings. It has been reported that in a five hour period one recent evening, Trump made 160 posts on social media. There are 300 minutes in 5 hours. That means he created and posted something just aboug every two minutes. How long does it take you to create a short post and upload it here? And the grammer, spelling and syntax of his posts are free of errors in those areas. This makwes me think that either Trump has a team of writers, or is using AI to generate the content.

If your doctor requests that you have some sort of test done, say a blood test to check cholesterol, do you have the test, but not ask the doctor for the results? You still want to hear that, don't you, even if the doctor tells you that things are OK? Trump keeps saying that he doesn't know the results of his MRI. That in itself is not normal. Also, Trump's apparent ignoring of his physical condition runs counter to a normal person's consideration of one's mortality. Does Trump think that he will never die?

A very small cohort of members are not sick of it.

Liar Leavett provided reporters with the doctor's summary of Trump's MRI examination. The summary said that the MRI showed that Trump's heart and ciculatory system was just fine, as were his abdominal organs. Can you believe that teh MRI only examined his torso? Given his many physical symptoms associated with muscle control, surely the MRI must have examined the contents of his cranium. But it probably only showed the cranial space filled with sheep shit.

It's raining! It's raining! But it will stop within a couple of hours. Better a little than none at all.

If you travel overseas and take along the habit of looking at a person approaching you and saying "g-day", then you eliminate the risk of being asked if you are English.

During our conversations earlier this year we questioned what the annual sales figures of EVs would be if we looked for those figures in December. I'm curious to see what those figures are (for Australia).

My Mum, who is 100 years old, is cared for in an aged persons' residence by people from the Phillipines. They are lovely, caring people. However, although they are fluent in the King's English, sometimes they do not understand the Australian terms for things in a domestic situation. When you think of the age difference between them and Mum, there can be three generations' difference between them. Mum uses terms that she learned as a child, in the 1930s, when there really was a unique Australian vocabulary. A lot of these terms have fallen out of common usage, so her carers have never encountered them. However, Mum has managed to teach them "hoo-roo" as a parting call.

I wanted to make the distiction between his being king of the United Kingdom, and being king of Australia. The United Kingdom and Australia are two separate things. If Australians ever decided to become a republic, it would be the King of the Commonwealth of Australia who would be replaced with another sort of Head of State. To say that Australia's Head of State is the king of England, inferring that Australia is the subject of a foreign king, is incorrect. King Charles III wears two crowns, and the rights given by those two crowns are independent of each other. In our modern world, does it really matter where the Head of State's place of abode is located?

When will people stop saying that? King Charles III is the King of the United Kingdom and at teh same time he is, separately, king of Australia. This is the wording of the Proclamation of King Charles III: Whereas because of the death of our blessed and glorious Queen Elizabeth the Second, the Crown has solely and rightfully come to Prince Charles Philip Arthur George: We, therefore, General the Honourable David Hurley AC DSC (Retd), Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, and members of the Federal Executive Council, do now proclaim Prince Charles Philip Arthur George to be King Charles the Third, By the Grace of God King of Australia. So we are the subjects of King Charles III of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Language evolves. It's evolution depends on the source and viability of the mutations that cause the evolution. Take a look at the words I used in my post above. A lot of them have mutated.

When was the last time an Australian or British movie was promoted in picture shows? (I refuse to use "cinema".) I haven't been to the fleas and itches for years. If I pass by a picture theatre, all I seem to see are posters for American flicks whose stories revolve around a dystopian America.