old man emu

Closing down the US Social Security Department is the modern application of the comment, "Let them eat cake". "Let them eat cake" is the traditional translation of the French phrase "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche", said to have been spoken in the 18th century by "a great princess" upon being told that the peasants had no bread. The French phrase mentions brioche, a bread enriched with butter and eggs, considered a luxury food. The quote is taken to reflect either the princess's frivolous disregard for the starving peasants or her poor understanding of their plight. Now it's often used to describe someone who is out of touch with the needs of others, as Trump and Musk obviously are. Attributed to Marie-Antoinette, the phrase can actually be traced back to Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Confessions in 1765, 24 years prior to the French Revolution, and when Antoinette was nine years old and had never been to France. Rousseau does not name the "great princess", and he may have invented the anecdote altogether, as the Confessions is not considered entirely factual.

What Trump and Musk are doing to the Government of the USA keeps bringing this short scene to mind And this one

A fool and his money are soon Partied.

Someone should tell Musk that air traffic control is not rocket science.

Good shit, man.

Is the air actually hotter near the equator than away from it, or is it an apparent feeling of heat because the humidity is so high one's evaporative cooling fails?

By the way, who told Trump he could tell the Ukraine that they had no place in the peace talks? Not one US military person fought in that war with the approval of the US government. Zelenskyy's demand to sit at the table reminds me of Billy Hughes' retort to US President Wilson at the Paris, "“I speak for 60,000 Australian war dead,” When US President Woodrow Wilson tried to belittle Australian Prime Minister Billy Hughes at the 1919 Versailles peace conference by asking who he represented.

I interpret that statement to imply GON thinks that our current immigrants are radical Lefties. From my observation of immigrant settlement in the area of Sydney where I used to live, I would say that the immigrants are very conservative. Sure, there are a few deeply radicalised ones, but they are radicalised to the far Right. Every society has its nut cases. What would a Far-Right Minister for Immigration do? Ask each immigrant if they believed in equality of the sexes, or were in favour of nuclear and coal power generation over solar and wind? I think most immigrants would shrug their shoulders and simply ask for employment for themselves and an education for their children

Question Time is the parliamentary equivalent of those "reality" shows on TV. It's all theatrics.

AI and BS, not to mention also, smoke and mirrors.

I was taking advantage of the rights and priviledges of my poetic licence.

This year are you going to give your predictions earlier in the week so we can get a bet on?

That's where he got his on International Relations policy from. If you look at what he wants to do in various places, it reflects the mentality of a real estate wheeler dealer.

International public opinion surveys of the trustworthiness of various occupations consistently place politicians at the bottom, with about 15% of people thinking politicians are trustworthy. You have basically agreed on that point in your recent posts. I would attribute this lack of trust to everyone's access to what's happening in the world through internet access. I'm not going to comment on the clearly bad effects of false information. I feel that the acceptance of that bad information is due to a failure to be critical of what pops up. Those who are critical soon sort the wheat from the chaff. So I will say that without our access to information via the internet, politicians would still be getting away with things as they have done since time immemorial. How will this lack of trust manifest itself? The ideals upon which our political system evolved have been corroded by those who sought our support to place them in positions of leadership. Is it possible to eradicate that corrosion? Perhaps it could be done by only voting for non-aligned candidates who are told that ignoring the voice of their electorate can result in the candidate being made to resign the position. One flaw in my otherwise flawless plan is that being involved in the actual running of a government is something that has to be learned, much the same way that any person qualified to carry out an occupation has to learn. That is why we find that candidates have gained that learning by being involved fully in the machinations of Party politics. I introduce as Exhibit 1of a failure to gain that learning, one Donald Trump, a person upon whom Greatness has been thrust, but does not have the ability to make good of it.

Bugger! I thought it would be a loophole to use to deport them.

If Trump continues on his present course, which is very likely to impact Australia's economy, should some consideration be given to Australia's abandoning the G7 and moving towards BRICS. BRICS is an intergovernmental organization consisting of ten countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. It is considered to be a counterpart and alternative to the G7 bloc of the world's largest economies and combined represent nearly half of the world's population. Some in the West consider BRICS institutions an alternative to institutions such as those led by nations of the G7 bloc, which are among the world's leading economies. Others describe the grouping as an incoherent joining of countries around increasing anti-Western and anti-American objectives. Here's a link to an interesting, seemingly non-biased, for and against article examining what approach Australia should take towards BRICS in light of the current geopolitical situation. https://www.constructor.net.au/a-case-for-and-against-australia-joining-brics/

Do American troops stationed in Australia have Entry Visas?

We should stop comparing Trump to Hitler. Hitler might have been all sorts of a nasty bastard, but at least he had wrote his own manifesto before he gained power. Trump probably thinks that a manifesto is a big booze up for blokes only.

From draftnews? More like daft news.

Has the cold weather stopped you from peeing on your citrus trees?

Who decreed that the pilot sat on the left-hand side? At least helicopter designers got it correct.

Bloody Trump and Musk are infiltrating every thread on this forum.

I correct my typos, only because I know you lot would come down on me like a ton of bricks for conduct unbecoming of a member of the Grammar police.

Mine? No, that's all my own work.

I'm noticing that AI-generated posts are appearing here now. I become suspicious when a new member posts in several different threads in a very short time, and the original posts that are responded to are old, meaning that they don't reference other people's current posts in a thread. The other giveaway is the style of the posts. If you read the posts of our regulars, you form the opinion that you are listening to blokes speaking face-to-face. The style of the AI-generated posts is more formal. I know that I use a lot of words that would not be commonly heard around a barbecue gathering, but by now you all recognise it as my style. I recognise your various styles. But these questionable posts don't 'pass the pub test'.