octave

How are we using facial recognition technology to confirm your identity? It is to confirm your identity if they believe your account has been compromised. There is an option if you do not wish to submit a video. If our automated system can't confirm a match or if you choose not to use facial recognition technology, your selfie may go through manual review or you may be asked to confirm your identity another way.

I would suggest that water in the sump indicates a serious problem, such as a blown head gasket or cracked engine block.

This video makes a good case against Henry's farm running only on electricity. I have no problem with that proposition. This is of course with today's technology. Just to be clear a lot of people think that net zero means not burning fossil fuels at all. This is not true. Net zero means a balance between greenhouse gases added and those removed. The anti EV folks love to present the worst-case scenarios as if that proves something. People have often said to me EVs are useless because I need to tow a caravan through central Australia. Yes this would be difficult at this stage, and I would suggest that such a person should not buy an EV at this time. My petrol-driven car would also be unsuitable for these kinds of drives. It will probably be some time before Henry's farm can operate on only electricity and perhaps in the future it will use some other fuel such as hydrogen. The massive imports of diesel are not really sustainable forever. Enormous farms will take a long time to be in a position to adopt cleaner technologies however, smaller farms are modernising. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhnU2wlBnFs&t

There has not been a trial. The court case was for defamation, and the recent court case was an unsuccessful attempt by BRS to overturn the previous case. My understanding is that as yet, no one has been charged with murder. Ben Roberts-Smith loses appeal bid to overturn defamation case loss, signals High Court challenge

I imagine that the infrastructure that we enjoy and rely upon today was a substantial cost to the tax payers if the day. There is a wise old saying " a society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they will never sit"

https://www.facilitiesdive.com/news/rogue-communication-devices-found-on-chinese-made-solar-power-inverters/748237/

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8140203/we-are-so-sorry-pm-apologises-to-vietnam-veterans/

It is often a case of not knowing what you don't know. I spent most of my working life teaching music, and I have had more than one of these students, four lessons in, and they believe they are close to knowing it all, whereas those who have been learning longer tend to appreciate how much they have yet to learn.

There was a belated welcome home parade in Sydney in 1987. I know this because I took part in it as a musician in the RAAF band. From memory Hawke gave a speech. I believe there were about 2000 vets marching. I am not saying this is enough but times have changed somewhat.

GON inflation is not an ever worsening problem that we did not have on the "good old days". For some years before COVID inflation and interest rates were low. Inflation is now starting to go down. Whilst this is difficult for many the situation is improving. Housing prices seem to be a problem around the world to varying degrees. I am not sure what the answers are. Governments can tinker around the edges but I don't think they can wave a magic wand and lowe prices. GON, do you have any suggestions?

Oh dear, that prediction did not age well. I seen to remember you also assuring us that Trump would not impose tariffs on Australia because, blah blah blah fentynol. It is hard to see the outcome of this election as anything but a repudiation of those things that you and the Trumpsters hold dear.

Dutton looks like he could lose his seat

Crash of a Consolidated PB2B-2 Catalina on Lord Howe Island: 7 killed

I have fond memories of Lord Howe Island. When I was a musician in the RAAF, we made many visits there. The landings and takeoffs in a C-130 were always exciting. These trips were in the 80s, and from memory, we used to perform at "Founders Day" events. Back then it was a big deal, and we seemed to have some celebrity status. We would be put up by the locals and shown a good time with boat trips, etc. On one occasion, I was able to get my wife on the RAAF flight. On another occasion, after takeoff, the crew put a cargo strap across the rear of the aircraft, and they opened the back ramp as we flew past Balls Pyramid.

Nah, not offered but I am not particularly a "sausage man" In and out as quickly as possible. Another observation is that it seems to me that most people don't take "how to vote" material from the party people outside the booth. I haven't done this for many, many years. I used to take a brochure from the party or candidate I wanted to vote for and then one from all the others so as not to signal my vote. We did our research before we went, and I suspect this is what many people are doing.

Well, we voted this morning. We were discussing the popularity of early voting, which a large percentage of the population seems to like. At the polling booth, there are signs listing the acceptable reasons for voting early. At no point were we asked if we were eligible. It seems to me that in practice, it doesn't matter. I think the days of having 1 day in which to vote are outdated. Given that many more people work on weekends these days, a voting window of one day seems a little restrictive. Rather than maintaining the fiction that voting early is only for people who would be overseas or otherwise unavailable to vote, perhaps the voting window could be one or two weeks, and political campaigns could cease before this voting period. I get the idea that significant announcements in this present campaign might be made after my vote, however, I don't tend to vote on individual promises that may or may not be kept anyway. I tend to vote on a candidate's philosophy. I am, and have always been, progressive, therefore, I am unlikely to vote for a party whose values are conservative.

I have relied on a refund from a credit card company refund for goods that did not turn up or were not up to standard on a couple of occasions. The process was quick and simple.

Because in Australia in 2022 (3 years ago), only 13% of transactions were made by cash. Logically (and logic is very important to me) it is a big ask to expect a company to invest large sums of money in the technology required to take cash and to pay people to go and retrieve that cash and do the accounting and then deposit that cash in the business's account. I suspect that those for whom operating only with cash are very unlikely to adopt new technologies like EVs.

Red, that sounds correct. The Tesla network is easier because it requires no apps, you register the car and the charger knows which car is being charged. I saw a YouTube clip this morning about Norway. They have had, I think for about a year now, a law that says all new chargers must have a card reader or tap and go facility. This avoids the need for apps. In NZ I have noticed that there are loads of petrol stations that are unstaffed. These stations, which appear in towns and out in the sticks, are just like a normal petrol station minus the building. In other words just the pumps and an awning. You swipe your credit or debit card, put the fuel in and then it spits a receipt out. I think one of the reasons this is not more widespread in this country is that petrol stations want to get you inside so you might buy other items.

We did exactly this. We were in an air BnB. My son rang the owner and asked if they minded us charging overnight. They were fine with but this was a granny lead maximum 10 AMPs this is not a problem compared to running a heater all night. Using a standard PowerPoint imposes limits. Motels sometimes have proper chargers that do use larger quantities of power. These are a business decision, and either it is a third-party installation in which case I suspect they take a cut of the profit or they supply it to attract customers. I don't really care whether people here want to buy an EV or not. I won't buy one until my present car dies, it is simply not economically viable given the few km I drive. I do think people tend to come up with a multitude of reasons why they are unviable; often, these reasons are not based on real-world experience. Likewise, it is easy for enthusiasts to not understand to downsides. This is why I posted my original post (which I regret now)

That is not quite correct. My point was that whenever we needed to stop for the toilet or food we also took the opportunity to stick a bit of charge in. It always not a case of wondering around blindly hoping to stumble on a charger. The route planner gave numerous options along with co located facilities such as food or toilets etc. We stopped twice in 4 hours one of these was to buy supplies and coffee and the second for tor a toilet break. This at least for me was little different from a petrol driven trip I posted of an account of the trip because I thought it would add some useful input.

Onetrack that does seem a little paranoid. My electricity bill comes straight out of my account as does my internet. I can assure you that I am astute enough to monitor these things. The car keeps a record of electricity purchased. It is not true that you can own it charge a Tesla without a credit card.

Just another thought on battery swapping. My son has a Tesla 3, and his girlfriend has a BYD Atto 3. These vehicles have different battery chemistries and, of course, are physically different in terms of size, weight, attachment methods, etc. In order for battery swapping to be the common way, there needs to be standardisation. As well as being a complex task for every manufacturer to use the same standard, there is also the problem that this could stifle progress. If a battery has to be in a specific location. What if a manufacturer wanted for reasons of handling and weight distribution, to put some of the batteries in the front and some in the back? Whilst battery swapping in optimal cases can be done in a few minutes, EVS are also getting much quicker to charge. As they do get quicker, the case for battery swap will diminish.

Can I ask if this is a researched assertion, or is it your gut feeling? My post, which was intended as part of a debate. I was talking about NZ. I don't have practical experience of travelling around Australia. I know there are EV drivers who have travelled around Australia. If your argument is that we should be rolling out more infrastructure, then I am in agreement with you. Although I had no particular point to make with my initial post, if I were to make a point, it would be that we are lagging behind other countries. Whilst I believe battery swapping may be part of the solution, especially for larger commercial vehicles, I don't believe that they are the main solution. If you believe we can't build a charging network quickly enough, what makes you think we can build a battery swapping network (including remote) quickly enough? How does a remote battery swap centre ensure an adequate supply of batteries? If I swap a battery in the middle of the Nullabor Plain, I would presumably swap it again at another swap centre many miles away. How does the remote swap centre maintain a stock of batteries when people are taking them away and not bringing them back? Sure other people coming the other way might be dropping off batteries but it would be a bit of a balancing act. The solution to having enough chargers is to build them, not to avoid EVS. Interestingly, when you actually have a look at charging centres, they are often provided by private businesses. We use one at a Westfield shopping mall car park. Why was it there? Well, we went inside and bought some food. The charging centre at the golf club I assume, utilises some of their carpark and presumably gets a share of the revenues, and I suppose it benefits their members who drive EVs. Whilst in NZ we got a bus from Christchurch Airport into the City. Many of the buses are electric, and all of the airport buses are EV. They can drive around the city all day and they charge over 2 hours at night. Electric buses – all you need to know

I can say that NZ is way ahead in terms of EV adoption. Charging facilities are everywhere there are not queues to use them anymore than there are queues for petrol stations. Yes if everyone suddenly bought an EV overnight then there might be a temporary problem. I am sure back when Henry Ford started producing the Model T, people might have worried that there would not be enough petrol refuelling points. Countries like Norway seem to cope with a much higher percentage of EVs than either Australia or NZ. Fun fact In a significant milestone for the state, California now has 48% more public and shared private EV chargers than the number of gasoline nozzles. California Energy Commission (CEC) estimates there are about 120,000 gas nozzles in the state, compared to 178,000 public and shared private chargers. Your question, "what about when EVs are the majority," seems to presuppose that the number of petrol or electricity refuelling points is not driven by demand. In Australia, the majority of new cars are petrol at this point. I haven't checked this figure, but I would imagine that this year there are more petrol cars on the road than last year. OMG what will happen when there aren't enough petrol stations? Of course, demand creates supply. I wasn't really expecting my post to "fuel" a debate; I just thought practical experience was of interest.