Jump to content

Siso

Members
  • Posts

    398
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Siso

  1. Even with all the doom and gloom an Frances NP, still smashing power into its neighbors. Germany not so much.
  2. we went cars, they were faster , used a more energy dense fuel. We had coal/gas, now we are going back to less energy dense fuel. We will see what happens, unfortunately!
  3. If it makes sence, why the incentives?
  4. once in how many years,solar shuts down evert night
  5. havent listened to radio national, was on the 730 report
  6. Not to look biased. We had a reporter saying that legitamising one nation is a bad thing. I'm not saying they aren't the most trusted source as they should be because they are paid for by the tax payer and that is the difference. Imagine how they would have reacted if the Murdoch press put a cartoon on similar to what the ABC had with Gina except use Wong or Gallagher. They are doing a terrible job at not looking biased.
  7. Less bias is not no bias. They are funded by the tax payer and should have no bias. That's the fact Jak! Everyone knows that the other broadcasters are biased. Albo got asked difficult questions on the abc the other day and he just didn't answer it regarding his lunch with the Chinese dude. They just let him get away with it, they wouldn't let the other party's get away with it without some commentary. ABC does the most investigative commentary and adds a bit to make it sell. Remember the extra shots they put in when the Aussie soldiers were shooting out a helicopter. Something the Murdoch press would do!
  8. I saw an interview with Penny Wong a few months ago on insiders. The first 5 mins was just having pot shots at the opposition. As well as being kept on subject by the interviewer the opposition gets the "I don't believe you" lines chucked in during the interviews. Murdoch has nothing to do with this. Everyone knows they are biased. The ABC is paid for by the taxpayer and should treat all sides of government the same. No Brainer really. The left leaning think they are the best things out. I have people in my direct family that think the same. They don't appreciate it being bought to their attention. Just so you know, the last time I can remember voting for a major party at the top of the voting slip was when Howard bought in the gst and I did not support that. None have earnt my vote towards the top of the voting slip since.
  9. If the ABC wasn't so biased itself, maybe they would get more interviews with them.
  10. Never said she was the answer, problem is the encumbent isn't either. You are the one that started calling people childish names. Grow UP!
  11. she didn't ask to leave, just said if you don't like it go back. Stale tart, talking about the greens member are you?
  12. Just as well I can lift heavy things, or use to be able to.😁
  13. Or like the ABC. I see that ABCs interview with Albo about the billionaire he had lunch with didn't include any commentry weather they didn't believe what he was saying from the interviewer.
  14. If you are invited into someones home and start to mouth of about the traditional parts of their lifestyle and mouth of about a person who didn't actually have anything to do with the stuff that upsets them, I am sure that you are within your rights to tell them to leave. Pretty sure if we were in Pakistan and started to act like that it wouldn't go down to well. My definition of racism would be that the person was told to go back there just because of their heritage.
  15. Can't see why.
  16. Yes, he did. The difference is he took it to an election when he changed his mind. Huge difference! Maybe we could mention "there won't be a carbon tax in a government I lead."
  17. Still a broken promise though. Albo probably had more plans on doing it then Trump did.
  18. is it racism?
  19. Is that anything like albo and co promising not to change negative gearing? Maybe they both had their fingers crossed.
  20. Net 0 using weather dependent intermittent generation, allowing men playing in women's sport etc and lying about cutting negative gearing. 3 just off the top of my head.
  21. We will see. It is going to get harder as the penetration of renewables increase. There will be more machine contrained during the windy and sunny days meaning that prices will go up to pay for these machines. Underutilised plant cost $$$$$. The fact that labour has subsidised batterys has taken customers away from paying for grid infrastructure. People can off set there whole bill meaning other people who cant afford batterys or rent accomodation have to subsidise these peoplesbills as well as the batterys. I think we will end up paying a subscription type cost like we do for phones. (after everyone is sucked in to get batterys)
  22. France will be and I would say all ready are looking at wind and solar, but they will always have their NP to do the heavy lifting. The reason they are curtailing nuclear generation is because of environmental issues that weren't thought of at the time. I would think this would not happen with their new builds. Are they really cheaper then Nuclear over 80 years, Really? Currently France exporting about 12GW with a green grid. Germany, not so much! https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/france https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/zone/FR/72h/hourly
  23. So windfarms in city parklands? Was in Europe recently, Quite a few in Amsterdam and could see a WTG from the London Eye. The ones in Amsterdam that I saw close were 3MW machine, so reasonably large.
  24. With electricty (I'm a fan by the way) we need to remember transmission losses as well.
×
×
  • Create New...