Grumpy Old Nasho

So you agree that first past the post is ok? But would you still agree if the candidate who won was a One Nation candidate, you wouldn't condemn that candidate for winning in a first past the post competition.

"something better" means Govt handouts and the pension, and the means by which immigrants can send remittance back home. $5 billion sent home by Indians, $3.5 billion sent home by Chinese. Add the rest and it reached $25 billion (in 2024). And my village can't even get a dusty main dirt street sealed. Our Council simply hasn't got the money. A grant from the State Govt would only need to be about $2-3 million. The traffic is quite extensive because of a popular camping ground. The street is short but the dust from it gets in/on everything, in your lungs. Everything needs constant cleaning.

Still a lot of money monitoring associates of a terrorist organization, who are supposed to be just Australian citizens. They'll be getting Govt social handouts too, when Imam Albo and Tony Burqa said the Govt won't help them with their repatriation.

If any electorate has only two candidates running, it then becomes first past the post.

Millions spent on ISIS brides for monitoring Public safety means nothing to this Labor Govt. I've never thought it ever did anyway.

We're at the beginning of a transitional period, questioning whether we should continue with ALP and Coalition ideological policy making and vote chasing. It's all becoming very damaging to Australia. We've lost car manufacturing. The cancellation of Inland Rail, etc, etc. We're getting no where.

Well the ISIS brides will get the pension as well when they reach 67, and they won't have improved with age either. The two party ALP and Coalition system is on it's last legs, we're all seeing them for what they really are, ideological dictators, telling everyone else to sit down and shut up. They rely solely on preference voting, not primary votes, to win seats. As such, all squares must be marked for votes to be formal. So the entire voting system is based on preferences, otherwise the system fails to work. Being mandatory to mark every square is dictatorship. Fill them all out, or your vote won't count.

What about when the battery is discharged to 3/4 or 7/8, does the car slow down because of voltage drop? or does it have some sort of regulator to maintain full power until it suddenly dies, and dies quickly?

Traditional Aussies are 4th generation Australians or better. As I have said before, we are not all Anglos, there are other ethnicities, but we all think the same Aussie way. We've copped a hiding since the advent of multiculturalism, SBS, international lefty progressive politics, and mass immigration. These have turned Australia inside out and upside down. Just as you vote for how you like, I will vote for how I like - One Nation, nothing else.

"Humbug" - that was easy.

Are you sure you wouldn't like China to be our most important Ally?

It's about time Traditional Aussies were represented in Parliament.

My place is a certain height above sea level. The town I go to is even higher above sea level. That's what I mean by "uphill all the way".

Better stick to petrol cars I think. No power to weight ratio restrictions. No charging batteries for 1/2 an hour if a charging station can be found, and hoping no one else is using it. How quickly do the batteries discharge if the trip to town is uphill nearly all the way? That's my predicament, uphill for 80ks, downhill coming home. Checking my petrol mileage via my liters per 100ks gauge, much more petrol is used going to town than coming home. If I had an electric car, I probably would have to charge the battery in town so I could get back home. But what if there were motorists lined up to use the charging station? How long does it take for each car to be charged? I might be there all night waiting.

Ask Red