Grumpy Old Nasho

You wouldn't believe that distortion of facts, would you? What a rag that UStoday is.

He was of Ukrainian background too. He was a watchmaker by trade, just out of his apprenticeship, and he was put in Infantry. The warmongers killed him off. Typical of govt warmongers, as long as it's not them. His young brother attended the ceremony in Canberra honoring conscripts, many years later. I called his dad the same day, I found his name in the phone book. He was quite astounded that a stranger would go to that trouble. I said I knew his son, and we talked a bit. He was a broken man, being an immigrant after WW2, coming here for safety and a better life.

Please don't blaspheme about Rookwood cemetery. A digger from my platoon in basic training is buried there, killed in Vietnam by a camouflaged booby trap while on a "Search & Destroy" mission.

Telstra is copying Trump now in one of their ads *Beautiful internet starts here* $95/month

If they don't know now, they'll never know. How many cyclones have crossed the coast of Qld? heaps. The politicians don't know what they're doing, except to mouth off how they'll fix things. Without something to fix, they're lost. So there will always be something amiss, so they can show us how they're going to fix it.

You don't think Albo would let an opportunity pass him by do you? If the results of the cyclone are going to be that critical, then both party leaders should join to announce assistance for potential victims as a bipartisan effort, and that way there'd be no point scoring or one sneakingly trying to gain advantage over the other.

Sorry, I spelt "sails" wrong.

The United States is being bled dry by being the Worlds policeman. Why do you think Trump is cutting waste and unnecessary costs?

It looks like the minerals deal will go through. The conflict will halt in a day or two and peace will be restored.

No, I'm saying it shouldn't try to make political mileage out of it.

For Albanese, it'll be about helping victims of the cyclone, making political mileage from peoples' suffering. He'll call the election on that to take the wind out of Dutton's sales. Election dates should be fixed.

Well stand by and watch other people die then, as long as it's not you blokes, that's right isn't it? If Trump was taken out of the equation, Putin would still have field artillery nukes and willing to use them. Then what? Do you believe he won't use them? Just let opposing nations go in with troops to fight the Russians, and see what happens. Alternatively, and again, without Trump, NATO & Co and the US (under someone else), would continue to supply arms to Ukraine, at great long term cost, boosting Zelensky's determination to oust the Russian forces, and destroying more of Ukraine and his people. He'll have to resign, or he may just get sacked by his govt. Trump is virtually out of the negotiations now, and US aid to Ukraine has stopped, so let's see what the rest of the World can do, make or break Ukraine, the latter seems likely.

It's not defense spending, it's aid to keep a war going. I'd prefer the pot holes were filled around here, put the money to better use. Put Australia first rather than warmongering. Fueling wars is against International Law no matter who does it. Trump is quite right in stopping any further aid the Ukraine, or anyone else for that matter. We're not in the stupid age of Johnson and Nixon who killed 56,000 American soldiers, and our putrid govt that killed 500 young blokes in Vietnam only to be soundly beaten and then the govts fell in love with communist Vietnam ... bloody hell, give me a break. It's alright for Albanese, Starmer, and Europe to supply weapons of war, but those slimy cowards are never on the front line. They are inhumane indecent creeps who should be thrown in jail for the death and destruction they're causing. President Trump is the only one who trying to put an end the war, and war in general.

US Admits Sending $40 Million Weekly to Afghanistan Amid Controversy Conspiracy? https://afghanistanpeacecampaign.org/2024/01/20/us-admits-sending-40-million-weekly-to-afghanistan-amid-controversy/

USAID was donating US$44million per week to the Taliban. Explain why that should continue?