kaz3g Posted December 3, 2014 Posted December 3, 2014 Julie is HOT!!! Down here in Victoria, Julie is in the middle of winter and definitely COLD! Kaz
fly_tornado Posted December 3, 2014 Posted December 3, 2014 Who doesn't want a nuclear power plant, lots of jobs!
Old Koreelah Posted December 3, 2014 Posted December 3, 2014 Who doesn't want a nuclear power plant...! Me
fly_tornado Posted December 3, 2014 Posted December 3, 2014 But but but Julie has already spent the donour's cheque
bexrbetter Posted December 3, 2014 Posted December 3, 2014 Julie is not one of his faves just wondering why he wishes to post her. I think it is good to see Julie in her younger days. Julie is special keep it up F_T. . He's just trying to get me excited ...
turboplanner Posted December 3, 2014 Posted December 3, 2014 Down here in Victoria, Julie is in the middle of winter and definitely COLD! Kaz Yes, as a group they just haven't been reading the electorate at all. Every step has been further off the path. However, in Victoria, we are about to see a Little Fauss and Big Halsey act https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4I61hU4SF1M with very little depth in a Cabinet where, before they have even been sworn in, the factions have knocked out some of the depth. I've never before seen the farm given away on election night. Added to that is a balance of power situation in the Victorian Upper House which will be just as frustrating as it has been to the Gillard/Abbott governments, where the incumbent finishes up with the blame. None of that will help though, unless the Federal coalition can get some momentum up, furstly by putting an end to the anti-people decisions. She wouldn't be the first great politician I've seen swept from power in a landslide.
fly_tornado Posted December 3, 2014 Posted December 3, 2014 you guys say julie is really hot but you really want hot and dumb
Admin Posted December 3, 2014 Posted December 3, 2014 Enough people, stop trolling and get back to topic
gandalph Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 Enough people, stop trolling and get back to topic Yes Mum! Sorry Mum!
motzartmerv Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 What exactly is the topic? That people are generally crappy spellers, or that nobody should share their point of view on a public FORUM. Actually, seeing as the use of the native tongue is the hot topic, lets have a look at the definition of the word FORUM From Websters Dictionary: noun: forum · plural noun: forums a meeting or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged: One could infer from the meaning of the word FORUM (see above) that when clicking on a button that clearly says " FORUM" that the presser of that button might reasonably expect to be presented with " ideas and views on a particular issue". To click the FORUM button, and then ADD POST (to the for mentioned forum) only to complain about the "ideas and views" expressed by the participants in the FORUM, seems a little I dunno... Wait... Im doing it too..Im expressing concern over the "ideas and views" of a poster...Dammit!!!... I dislike this post. Where is the dislike button...
gandalph Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 What exactly is the topic? That people are generally crappy spellers, or that nobody should share their point of view on a public FORUM.Actually, seeing as the use of the native tongue is the hot topic, lets have a look at the definition of the word FORUM From Websters Dictionary: noun: forum · plural noun: forums a meeting or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged: One could infer from the meaning of the word FORUM (see above) that when clicking on a button that clearly says " FORUM" that the presser of that button might reasonably expect to be presented with " ideas and views on a particular issue". To click the FOPRUM button, and then ADD POST (to the for mentioned forum) only to complain about the "ideas and views" expressed by the participants in the FORUM, seems a little I dunno... Wait... Im doing it too..Im expressing concern over the "ideas and views" of a poster...Dammit!!!... I dislike this post. Where is the dislike button... Well the topic is points pedants and pr*cks so what's wrong with discussing politicians? Seems to fit the topic perfectly. Sorry mum:happy:
rankamateur Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 My only criticism is that perhaps "Points, Pedants and Pricks" should have been posted in OFF TOPIC unless that was a flying prick.
dutchroll Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 I don't think I have ever done a put down on the forum, but I can understand some of the gripes about poor English. The incorrect substitution of a possessive adjective instead of the contraction of the second person singular present tense of the verb "to be" is a common fault which needs to be rooted out on this forum before we discuss such trivia as far-ranging proposals for airworthiness directives or operating restrictions. ("Your" = it belongs to you. "You're" = you are)
facthunter Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 So a "Pedant" is illustrated... Good one Dutch.. The last word is incomplete. It could be Pracks precks pricks procks prucks prycks. Christ said it is hard to kick against the pricks but he wasn't absorbed with sex like you lot, as the ones he was referring to were in thorny bushes, like Brer Rabbit had himself thrown into. In the context of the thread heading it can be assumed to be a "Dastardly Bounder of the Worst Kind' or an "Uncouth Barbarian" or as we oft tend to use genitalia as a demeaning term, take your lick there.. . Points are what I have not achieved here, but had I been more successful I would have made one. Nev
Bikky Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 The incorrect substitution of a possessive adjective instead of the contraction of the second person singular present tense of the verb "to be" is a common fault which needs to be rooted out on this forum before we discuss such trivia as far-ranging proposals for airworthiness directives or operating restrictions. Your quiet good at grammer I see.
bexrbetter Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 Your quiet good at grammar I see. He makes no noise while writing?
kaz3g Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 The incorrect substitution of a possessive adjective instead of the contraction of the second person singular present tense of the verb "to be" is a common fault which needs to be rooted out on this forum before we discuss such trivia as far-ranging proposals for airworthiness directives or operating restrictions. ("Your" = it belongs to you. "You're" = you are) I would of avoided it if I had of known it was pore English Kaz ps. thank goodness for spell check
geoffreywh Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 Ik kan natuurlijk antwoorden in een andere taal, maar dan vliegt het gehele punt het raam uit!............... Your it!.............................
Bikky Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 Ik kan natuurlijk antwoorden in een andere taal, maar dan vliegt het gehele punt het raam uit!............... Your it!............................. Kijk uit! Ik kan ook Nederlands spreken. Eu posso falar português também. Now your it!
eightyknots Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 Kijk uit! Ik kan ook Nederlands spreken. Eu posso falar português também. Now your it! Ik kan ook Nederlands verstaan. Nederlands is eigenlijk een makkelijke taal om the spellen, maar de grammatica is moeilijker.
bexrbetter Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 nimen shi ben dan danshi wo fei tang tongming. women suo waiguo hua hen duo, lao ban bian bu gao xin!
Bikky Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 你们 是 本 但 但是 我 非 唐 同名. 我们 所 外国 花 很 多, 老 半 便 不 高 新! Are you this, but the same name, but I am not Don. We spend a lot of foreign countries, it is not the old semi-tech! WTF?!
eightyknots Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 你们 是 本 但 但是 我 非 唐 同名. 我们 所 外国 花 很 多, 老 半 便 不 高 新! Are you this, but the same name, but I am not Don. We spend a lot of foreign countries, it is not the old semi-tech! WTF?! I hope you're not getting too pedantic here, Bikky!
pmccarthy Posted December 4, 2014 Posted December 4, 2014 Points to ponder. The group noun for pedants is a "parliament" of pedants. There is no group noun for pr&cks but parliament would serve there as well. Back on topic now...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now