Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yep, I thought that the first time too....BUT, he only just won and with a lot of help from russia. That will all be a negative for the next time. AND he lost against old Biden, I reckon the gulf will only grow.

Posted

They also  slag each other off in the primaries, giving ammunition for the opposite Party to use.. It's survival of the FATTEST (wallet) there. and that often comes with the FATTEST  HEAD.   Nev

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Russia's main rail supply route from Crimea is out of action. The Chongar rail bridge on the Crimea/Kherson border has been damaged in a missile strike. Rail lines are marked in white on the map, the bridge marked in red.

 

F2Xr_1RXoAI_j3d.png

F2Xc5teWoAAljB5.png

  • Informative 1
Posted

It's also on the land abutment and not on a span over water. That would make it easier to fix. There were some photos of pillar damage underneath, but no proof or verification they were from this strike or an old one from somewhere else.

  • Like 2
  • Informative 1
Posted
1 hour ago, spenaroo said:

anyone having flashes of Enemy at the gates, Where they cut down the communications lines. just to keep taking out the repair workers

One of the worst Russian tactics is where they launch a missile or artillery strike, wait a suitable amount of time, then target the rescuers. They did it in Syria and are doing it in Ukraine. They also targeted rescuers and flood victims with artillery barrages in Kherson after the dam was blown.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
4 hours ago, willedoo said:

One of the worst Russian tactics is where they launch a missile or artillery strike, wait a suitable amount of time, then target the rescuers. They did it in Syria and are doing it in Ukraine. They also targeted rescuers and flood victims with artillery barrages in Kherson after the dam was blown.

Beyond evil. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Posted

America has the same problem we have though,
lack of a decent opposition.

I don't have anything against Biden... but you cant tell me he is the most suitable for a second term against Trump.
which then adds the influence, does America accept Kamala as president when Biden is deemed unfit? 

its the old Rudd v Howard... where the losing element was knowing you were actually voting Costello.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

I was on a training course yesterday and the facilitator, born in the US but emigrated here in 2010, said that 38m people support Trump but 62m people are horrified at the very idea of him.

The question of course is how many of them, despite their horror at the man himself, feel more horrified at the thought of a "progressive left-wing" Democrat government.

If everyone who hated the thought of Trump winning in 2024 went out and voted for Biden it wouldn't be an issue.  But it's not that simple unfortunately.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1
Posted

Money distorts any election, even here.  Political donations should be only allowed from individuals (not companies, unions etc) and a cap of say $20 per person.  And not received as a lump sum for 1,000 people who, for example, all work for Clive Palmer.  

 

The trouble is, companies have vastly more access to political leaders than every individual, because they pay for it.  But the government is not there to benefit companies, it's there to benefit the people of Australia.  And before you say "but companies are formed from people"- then I would say that every staff member of the company is a person in their own right who will vote the way they want to, and so is every shareholder (the ones actually in Australia), so why does the company need special access to government?

Same goes for unions, sporting groups, whatever clustering you want to look at.  They're all individuals, so government should be there for all of them PLUS all the individuals who are not a member of those groups.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 2
Posted
6 hours ago, spenaroo said:

which then adds the influence, does America accept Kamala as president when Biden is deemed unfit? 

The short answer is no. Kamala would have Buckley's chance. The only reason she's still there is that it would be too embarrassing for the Democrats to dump her at this stage. Plus she gives the added advantage of making Biden look good in comparison.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

I never cease to be amazed at the constantly evolving technology and tactics in warfare. Soldiers in trenches with mobile phones and internet access. Ukrainian intelligence has agents posing as women on dating sites and they are suckering Russian troops into giving away valuable information like positions, troop and equipment numbers, plans and logistics data. The orcs are falling for it hook, line and sinker. The average Russian grunt is not the sharpest tool in the shed.

  • Like 1
  • Informative 2
Posted

Ukraine with heavy attack: Putin’s “Grizzly” goes up in flames

 

Ukraine has achieved a success in the ongoing conflict with Russia. This reports the German newspaper merkur.de with reference to a corresponding video of Ukraine.

 

More story and video here.

 

  • Informative 1
Posted
15 hours ago, willedoo said:

I never cease to be amazed at the constantly evolving technology and tactics in warfare. Soldiers in trenches with mobile phones and internet access. Ukrainian intelligence has agents posing as women on dating sites and they are suckering Russian troops into giving away valuable information like positions, troop and equipment numbers, plans and logistics data. The orcs are falling for it hook, line and sinker. The average Russian grunt is not the sharpest tool in the shed.

no different to the intelligence brothels run during WW2.
same idea, different implementation

  • Like 1
  • Informative 2
Posted

Navalny stuffed up badly by going back to Russia. He might have achieved his goal to appear as a martyr to his western supporters, but the reality is, the west will eventually forget him and he's left stuck in a Russian rat hole prison. He would have received a lot more long term exposure if he had applied for political asylum and worked to promote himself in exile. People in Russia would take little notice of him either way, but at least in exile he would have kept his western fan base.

 

Navalny has always had trouble gaining much ground in Russian politics. Being primarily a self promoter, his position has swung with the breeze over the years to wherever he can gain popularity. A bit more than a decade ago, he started courting western support and toned down some of his more extreme right wing nationalistic views to appear more palatable to western audiences. His problem in Russia has been to find a political position where he can gain traction. I think that might have been his idea in focusing on corruption as a platform base.

 

He's been stuck between a rock and a hard place politically. By nature, he's a right wing nationalist, but there's already a major popular opposition party further to the right of his position. There is also a large popular party taking up the centre/centre-left. And there's no advantage for him to go way to the left as that's taken up by Russia's No.2 party, the Communist Party. He's always had delusions of being president of Russia, but the most he could have realistically achieved was to have been an opposition Kremlin critic in exile. It's doubtful he'd have the option of the Americans bailing him out in a prisoner exchange as he's a Russian citizen in a Russian prison.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

That was a good night for Ukraine's marine drones, or USV's as they call them. One navy landing ship out of action and listing badly to port, and one oil tanker, also with a possible hull breach. There's reports the tanker is immobilised with a flooded engine room. It was reported as empty at the time and is a Russian tanker used to transport fuel between Russia and Syria.

  • Like 1
  • Informative 2
Posted

I don't know how the Ukrainian USV's deliver a penetrating blast, but I'm assuming it would be on the surface, ie: the waterline of the target vessel. It would be good if they could launch a torpedo that would hit the hull a bit deeper. Or maybe both, a torpedo plus a surface blast when the drone hits. Sinking a ship has more propaganda value, but badly damaging one would tie up more resources in the repairing of it.

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1
Posted

Going by this satellite image, they were able to tow the ship to the dock in Novorossiysk and support it with a tug. That's probably where it will stay as there's no dry dock repair facility at Novorossiysk. There are dry docks in Sevastopol in Crimea but it would be doubtful they could get it in any condition to tow the ship there. At least, not in the short term. The Russian's are claiming they destroyed the drones; move along, nothing to see here.

 

F2siScoWQAAVpY6.png

  • Informative 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...