willedoo Posted April 5, 2023 Posted April 5, 2023 5 hours ago, red750 said: Putin protection officer defects and reveals despot's intense paranoia I see also that the Russian security services are confiscating the passports of government employees and those who work in critical industries. They're getting paranoid about defections. Mordor is crumbling. 1
willedoo Posted April 5, 2023 Posted April 5, 2023 11 minutes ago, Bruce Tuncks said: Zelinski, Nev, is the only rational choice. The the 2 will soon be dead or jailed. At least Zelensky has friends, the other two clowns only have each other. 2 1
Jerry_Atrick Posted April 5, 2023 Posted April 5, 2023 And they look such a happy couple.. we all know Putin likes to show off his "butch" image 1 1
Popular Post willedoo Posted April 7, 2023 Popular Post Posted April 7, 2023 This is a map of the 1991 Ukrainian independence vote percentages per region. Crimea aside (54%, 57%), of the other four occupied oblasts, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia were 90% in favour and the two Donbass oblasts were 83%. Hardly a mandate for Russia to rescue them. 2 2 2
facthunter Posted April 7, 2023 Posted April 7, 2023 Yes Vlad has achieved a result others only dreamed could ever happen in a bit over a year. Nev 2
Popular Post Old Koreelah Posted April 7, 2023 Popular Post Posted April 7, 2023 In relation to NATO, which seemed in its death throes, he can be said to have “snatched defeat from the jaws of victory”. 3 2
facthunter Posted April 8, 2023 Posted April 8, 2023 "Up the guts with TANKS" didn't seem to work, either. They are mobile crematoriums. Nev 2
willedoo Posted April 8, 2023 Posted April 8, 2023 2 hours ago, facthunter said: "Up the guts with TANKS" didn't seem to work, either. They are mobile crematoriums. Nev They work ok when used properly as part of a combined arms operation, like the Ukrainians did when they took back most of Kharkiv province. They had suppressing artillery fire, while the engineer crews went ahead of the tanks clearing mines. The tank regiment commander controlled all the tank movements remotely using drones to relay battlefield information back to the command post. Via good comms, he was able to direct the tanks, alert them to targets and warn them of threats. That negated a lot of the usual driving blind aspect of tanks. The tanks were the iron fist that routed enemy infantry, with Ukrainian infantry following behind in APC's and armoured fighting vehicles. In turn, the infantry was able to support and protect the tanks with ATGM's etc.. All textbook stuff, although it did help that they were fighting idiots. Then there's the Russian way of using tanks - drive the tank around singly or in small unsupported groups in a totally ad hoc manner until you get blown up. If the lead tanks drives into a minefield and gets blown up, follow suit. The Russians have been completely brain dead in their use of tanks and have squandered a large percentage of Russia's tank fleet and crews for very little gain. Mobile crematorium is a good description if they are operated by Russians. They don't seem to grasp the concept of combined arms warfare. They think they have enough men and equipment to simply headbutt their way through. The problem for them is that technology has made headbutting obsolete. 2 1
willedoo Posted April 9, 2023 Posted April 9, 2023 The former head of Antonov, Serhiy Bychkov, will be charged with crimes relating to the loss of the An-225 Mriya last year. https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/aircraft-propulsion/former-antonov-chief-faces-charges-225-destruction?utm_source=sendgrid.com&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=website 1 2
Jerry_Atrick Posted April 9, 2023 Posted April 9, 2023 That is an interesting charge when you consider days before the invasion, Zelensky himself was trying to calm nerves that the Russians wouldn't invade. If they are going to move forward post war with the west, they will have to learn to lose their ways adopted from years of Russian influence. 1 1
willedoo Posted April 9, 2023 Posted April 9, 2023 6 hours ago, nomadpete said: Is this a step toward draining the swamp? It could be; I guess we won't know until more details are available. On the face of it, he's only charged with dereliction of duty by failing to evacuate the plane after being asked to do so. He hasn't had any treason charges, so possibly he's not one of the pro-Russian officials that have been purged. An example of that was the president of aircraft engine manufacturer Motor Sich, Vyacheslav Boguslaev, who was charged with treason for supplying helicopter engines to the Russians. 1 1
Popular Post nomadpete Posted April 9, 2023 Popular Post Posted April 9, 2023 16 hours ago, Jerry_Atrick said: That is an interesting charge when you consider days before the invasion, Zelensky himself was trying to calm nerves that the Russians wouldn't invade..... My guess is that Zelensky was well aware that invasion was imminent but just didn't know when, and he wanted the Ruskys to think he was unprepared for it. 2 1 2
Bruce Tuncks Posted April 11, 2023 Author Posted April 11, 2023 Reading about how russians surrendering has increased, makes me even more sure that treating russians well if they surrender is a good idea. I would have them stay in a confiscated ukranian oligarch's mansion , wined and dined, and then repatriated to be treated cruelly by russians at the borders. ( on a prisoner exchange of course). Yes, the spies among them would wonder what to report. 2
willedoo Posted April 13, 2023 Posted April 13, 2023 Earlier in the week, some footage emerged of Ukrainian pilots training in the U.S. on A-10 Thunderbolts. You would have to assume if they are training on the type that the U.S. intends to supply Ukraine with Warthogs at some stage. I remember some time back, they were going to mothball the A-10's, but then decided to keep them going for a while. The closest aircraft to the A-10 role in Ukraine is the Su-25, but it's hard to make a comparison. They share similar roles, but both have advantages and disadvantages over each other. In a combat scenario, the Su-25 is much more survivable. They are a tough bird and can have an engine taken out and still fly back to base. The surface to air missiles are heat seeking and will often strike at the rear of the engine. With the high position of the A-10 engines, the tailplane would be unlikely to survive. I think at this stage, the Ukrainians would take anything that was offered. In the post war future, I'd think it would make sense for Ukraine to design their own ground attack aircraft. They already have the expertise of Antonov and Ivchenko engines; they could build an improved, modernised version of the Su-25 without too much trouble. One thing they are not short of is technical skill, as a lot of Soviet military equipment was designed, developed and built in Ukraine. Ship building, tanks and armoured vehicles, missile systems, aircraft - they've done it all. 1 1
willedoo Posted April 13, 2023 Posted April 13, 2023 On the subject of Ukrainian shipbuilding, the Russian navy carrier Admiral Kuznetsov and Russia's Slava class cruisers were built in Ukraine. As was the intended sister carrier to the Kuznetsov that Ukraine sold to China and is now the Chinese carrier Liaoning. 1
Old Koreelah Posted April 13, 2023 Posted April 13, 2023 A major reason Putin want Ukraine back under Russia’s control: it had much of the design and industrial talent of the USSR. Britain is in a similar situation; much of the Royal Navy is built by the Scots, so Scottish independence would by problematic. 1 1
willedoo Posted April 13, 2023 Posted April 13, 2023 On 05/03/2023 at 3:12 PM, onetrack said: Tracked vehicles with flat sealed undersides actually do quite well in muddy slop, they just paddle along quite happily - although speed and fuel consumption is adversely affected. In Vietnam, the M113 APC's, and the Centurions, had to put up with slop on a regular basis, in the wet season. This performance (below) was right after we had about 150mm overnight from the tail end of Typhoon Kate in Oct 1970. If you stepped off a machine in this ground after a heavy rain, you sank up to above your knees. We had to lay down Marsden Matting (PSP) to make a boardwalk out to the Landing and Refuelling pad for the choppers. You can see how far the oil drums sank into the ground, they were at ground level before the rain. On the subject of the M113, I read of the recent passing of Ray De Vere MC, OAM. Formerly Captain Ray De Vere, cavalry troop leader at the Battle of Binh Ba in 1969, where he was awarded the Military Cross. He received the OAM for his later service to veterans. 2
Popular Post onetrack Posted April 13, 2023 Popular Post Posted April 13, 2023 (edited) Yes, the ranks of the Vietnam veterans are starting to thin noticeably now, we saw most of the WW2 veterans start to disappear from the early 2000's, now they're a real minority. Our local PNG war hero and former MP, Bill Grayden is still going at 102, but I understand he's quite frail now. He marched with us strongly up until his late 90's. He's the oldest Federal MP still alive. Edited April 13, 2023 by onetrack 4 1 1
willedoo Posted April 13, 2023 Posted April 13, 2023 50 minutes ago, onetrack said: Our local PNG war hero and former MP, Bill Grayden is still going at 102, but I understand he's quite frail now. He marched with us strongly up until his late 90's. He's the oldest Federal MP still alive. I remember in the west, you also had the member of parliament who lost both legs in Vietnam; I can't remember his name. I seem to remember he lost them after dismounting, then turning back to free his Lieutenant who had caught his webbing on something, stepping on a mine in the process. 2
Bruce Tuncks Posted April 14, 2023 Author Posted April 14, 2023 On the subject of Scottish shipbuilding, I reckon it was a long time ago that they were big in shipbuilding. Before WW1, they were the best in the world. In fact the Gallipoli campaign was caused by Churchill " confiscating " 2 ships that the Turks had ordered and foolishly thought were theirs. This was why they were persuaded by the Germans to enter the war against the British. 2
Old Koreelah Posted April 14, 2023 Posted April 14, 2023 Churchill had a difficult decision to make: if he allowed the Turks to take delivery of these new British-built warships, they might have been used against them. (The French did someting similar to Russia not so long ago.) A quarter century later, Churchill had a far worse dilemma: what to do about the powerful French fleet, which after their surrender, would likely be used to greatly boost Hitler’s naval strength. After pig-headed French Admiral refused to bring his warships to the British side (he was reportedly miffed that the Royal Navy sent a mere captain to negotiate, rather than someone of equal rank) Churchill ordered them all sunk. The resulting carnage haunted him. 2 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now