old man emu Posted September 3, 2022 Posted September 3, 2022 Red posted this over on the Funnies section: Here's an old idea worth investigating. Why not use the principle of the putt-putt boat engine to power a people-carrying boat? The putt-putt engine has none of what we consider moving parts. It only requires a heat source to boil a relatively small amount of water, so the cost of generating heat might be a whole lot less than the cost associated with either an internal or external combustion engine they we are familiar with. It's very hard to explain this idea in writing, so here's a video in which the operation of a putt-putt engine is described. 1 1
facthunter Posted September 3, 2022 Posted September 3, 2022 I don't know how well it would work scaled up. Nev 1
pmccarthy Posted September 3, 2022 Posted September 3, 2022 My dad had them as bathtub toys in the 1930s. 1
octave Posted September 3, 2022 Posted September 3, 2022 Built one when of these with my son when he was younger. From memory we bought a kit from a company that sold science kits. I seem to remember it was a lot of fun although a little temperamental to get started. 1 1
Bruce Tuncks Posted September 3, 2022 Posted September 3, 2022 Good question Nev, the answer may well be that it works so poorly its not worth building one... I once built one, and it used a 3mm copper tube, so it was really small. 1 1
old man emu Posted September 3, 2022 Author Posted September 3, 2022 2 hours ago, facthunter said: I don't know how well it would work scaled up. Nev I suppose there must be some ratio between the volume of the boiler and the volume of the tubes. In the video, the presenter said that the forward motion was the result of unbalanced Momentum. Probably technically incorrect as I would invoke Newton's Third Law (equal and opposite forces), but that's a moot point at this stage. It's pretty obvious that this propulsion system is akin to a jet system, so to use this system to propel a small boat, like a tinny, you would have to know the value of the friction between the tinny's hull and the water to get an idea of the minimum Thrust needed just to get the tinny moving. The Coefficient of Friction is going to vary with hull design and, I think, the speed of the boat. But those are things to consider for a wider application of the method. First step is to see if a putt-putt engine could do it. Here's a research paper on the subject. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318000523_Factors_Influencing_Performance_of_a_Model_Steam_Engine_Putt-Putt_Boat 1
Yenn Posted September 3, 2022 Posted September 3, 2022 One of those crackpot ideas was actually used. The torroidal tit engine. The theory was that the cylinder of an engine had acircular depression in the top and in the depression there was a sharp spike pointing up to the cylinder head and it was well faired into the cylinder. The engine ran on soap bubbles with a goldfish in the carburettor. Air was sucked in and the goldfish blew a bubble which went into the descending dylinder, then the piston came up compressing the bubble. At TDC the torroidal tit burst the bubble forcing the cylinder down. The design was modified slightly and became the AEC diesel engine which was used in London buses. That was the story I was told when I was an apprentice working on AEC engines. 1
octave Posted September 3, 2022 Posted September 3, 2022 (edited) Edited September 3, 2022 by octave incorrect information 2
onetrack Posted September 3, 2022 Posted September 3, 2022 I'm afraid the first video just left me confused - perhaps it's because the bloke isn't really good at explaining it all. To acquire forward momentum, you must need to have an energy source, and expend energy to acquire that forward momentum. The energy is coming from burning the oil in the candle - so why not simply burn the oil in a little combustion engine? I guess the candle advantage is there's no moving parts, and no frictional losses, so the energy transfer level is improved over an IC engine.
willedoo Posted September 9, 2022 Posted September 9, 2022 On 03/09/2022 at 2:18 PM, facthunter said: I don't know how well it would work scaled up. Nev one problem would be finding a big enough spoon. 2
facthunter Posted September 9, 2022 Posted September 9, 2022 Scale up a bumblebee and it won't fly.. Nev 1 1
old man emu Posted September 9, 2022 Author Posted September 9, 2022 Ha! Ha! I bought two tins of sardines this week. Call me Admiral! 2
willedoo Posted September 9, 2022 Posted September 9, 2022 It reminds me a bit of how a pulse jet works. 1
Jerry_Atrick Posted September 9, 2022 Posted September 9, 2022 8 hours ago, old man emu said: Ha! Ha! I bought two tins of sardines this week. Call me Admiral! Weren't they the ones John rejected? 1 1
old man emu Posted September 9, 2022 Author Posted September 9, 2022 10 hours ago, willedoo said: It reminds me a bit of how a pulse jet works. Some mornings I'm just happy I have a pulse. 3
nomadpete Posted September 10, 2022 Posted September 10, 2022 On 10/09/2022 at 7:10 AM, old man emu said: Some mornings I'm just happy I have a pulse. Every morning I'm happy to have a pulse. (And yes, I do check)
spacesailor Posted September 11, 2022 Posted September 11, 2022 Every time , I,m asked " good morning " , I now answer, " every mornings good, with my New hip " . LoL spacesailor 1
old man emu Posted September 11, 2022 Author Posted September 11, 2022 Casey is an old man who wants to be a teen He goes to all the dances, and they call him cha-cha King He cha-chas when the band is playin' rock 'n' roll He tries to keep in time, but the beat leaves him cold Because he's too pooped to pop, is too old-school Hips gettin' weaker when he tries to do this stroll 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now