Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

100% of the media heaped on Andrews. You call him "despicable", The Libs campaign was personal and NASTY and did not work, so neither the media or the libs campaign was on the mark. Kroger  says crime ad policing and personal attack is the way to go. Thats why they are in deep $#1t and their own people know they need reform. The ones that think and don't live in their own "Echo Chamber". Nev

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Posted

Again, the Nationals triumphed in the seats they contested. But that is more likely to be the traditional rejection of the Labor Party and recently of the Independents who are seen as pandering to Change. Change being something country people seem to abhor.

  • Like 2
Posted

May be like the Ancient Mariner, the Nats are ridding themselves of an albatross around their necks.

 

An albatross around your neck causes you great problems from which you cannot escape, or the albatross prevents you from doing what you want to do.

  • Like 2
Posted

They must imagine they can go it alone whereas before they had a secret deal between them and the Libs no one was allowed to see. How is THAT democracy? In addition they probably cost the LIBS the last election with their hard line on climate change.. Not that the LNP deserved to win but the NP lost no seats so at the moment they are euphoric over nothing really. I can't see them (or the greens) EVER governing in their own right.  Nev

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, kgwilson said:

he worked himself to the bone & had to make decisions that were immensely unpopular with large sections of the population.

Indeed he did, and but while the press portrayed his decisions as unpopular, as well as McGowan and virtually every other state leader except Berajiklian (sp?), I am not so sure the deccisions DA took were tat unpopular, at least in the long run, as the press made out them to be. The press latched onto what looked like a vocal minority and whipped it up. On the other hand, in NSW, when Berejiklian finally announced a lockdown proper (or was it a second one.. can't quite recall), the press were "Hand in there, Sydney.." etc. It was shamefully unashamed bias.

 

My family and friends in Vic were not happy about the lockdowns, but accepted the need for them.  The low point for them was the fact the virus spread and what was portrayed as a cover up; and what appeared to be a draconian response to the housing commission flats that were locked down as hard as a Chinese apartment block.

 

In The Age online editorial yesterday (can't find it today), the writer honed in on how the Libs and the MSM - especially the Murdoch press - got it so wrong and were so out of touch with their electorate/readership. The comments to that peice were just as scathing of the Fairfax press as well... including some who had claimed to hand in their subscriptions at how biased the publication was.

 

A half-decent Menzies inspireed party would probably have romped it in yesterday; the Vic Libs have leaned too far right and while Australia is culturally similar to the US, it isn't ready for the right wing nut jobs just yet.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
  • Winner 1
Posted

Andrews went on and on about the Libs plan to shelve the suburban rail loop, which won't be ready in our lifetime, and spreading infrastructure around like confetti, when HE spent more than $1 billion buying his way out of a contract to build the East - West Link tunnel because it was funded by the federal LNP, and not a monument to the great DA. I think you all know what I and a lot of my friends think of him.

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, old man emu said:

If all the trees in Tazwegia were cut down, would we have to call it Brazegia?

Tazforestry (real name for government appointed environmental vandals),

is working toward that goal as we speak. But not as efficiently as the Victorian government.

 

 

Edited by nomadpete
Added sarky
  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1
Posted

Maybe not related to the election, but after losing many taffic lanes to bicycle lanes that are rarely used, and a lot of city street parking removed for bike lanes making deliveries to shops near impossible, now they want to replace parking spaces with trees to attract more people into the city. (Lord Mayor Sally Capp no doubt.) "Come on everyone, back to the city. Just walk 5 km to get there."

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, red750 said:

Maybe not related to the election, but after losing many taffic lanes to bicycle lanes that are rarely used, and a lot of city street parking removed for bike lanes making deliveries to shops near impossible, now they want to replace parking spaces with trees to attract more people into the city. (Lord Mayor Sally Capp no doubt.) "Come on everyone, back to the city. Just walk 5 km to get there."

They did that to a section of the main street in Toowoomba. In an area with a lot of shops, it used to have angle parking where heaps of cars could park in front of the shops. The council got rid of them and put in a small handful of parallel parking spaces to build a bicycle lane. The businesses suffered a downturn from the lack of parking and one shop worker I talked to said an average of six bicycles go past each day.

  • Like 1
Posted

When the price of ULP goes up to $5 /litre, you'll be hapily riding your pushy 5k to buy a loaf of bread and a pint o milk.

 

Waiton ..... I used to do that for mum when I was a kid.

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, octave said:

I am one of those horrid cyclists who appreciates bike lanes. The alternative where bike lanes do not exist is to take up our legal entitlement to a whole traffic lane.  If all of those cyclist were in their cars traffic would be a lot more congested…

I’m with Octave on this one…in principle. Unfortunately for many businesses and their traditional car-driving customers, Australians have not switched to pedalling in the numbers urban planners would like. We’re more like Yanks than Europeans.

 

Sales of bicycles has boomed in Australia, but most of them are rarely used.

I have quite a collection of bikes. I’d love to cycle the bike tracks in our little town every day, but pedalling to town past heavy highway traffic is too dangerous, so we have to fold them and load them in the car.

 

It’s probably a case of “Build it and they will come”. When the cycle network reaches enough people, they will use it.

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1
Posted

Safety is the cyclist's biggest problem.

Our council 'improved' the local highway to make cycling safer.

We have narrow bitumen frequented by B double logging trucks and semis, 100kph limit, double lines all the way to town, and a couple of narrow bridges that have no room for pedestrians nor cycles. But they added a foot of tar to the edge in a couple of places, mostly covered with chunky gravel, roadkill and broken glass.

 

It's only 8k to town and I'd gladly ride it just to get fit. But I'm too old to live that dangerously.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...