Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks for the summary Jerry. Must have been a multi wolfie marathon, staying up to follow the coverage. I admit to tuning out - it's all too far away to affect us in  our safe little liberal enclave

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

 

 

" Must have been a multi wolfie marathon, staying up to follow the coverage."

 

Nah.. I was up at the lake distrcit for the last few days, and was wathcing the Youtube coverage replay - I love election counts for some reason. So, no marathon. Took about 12 hours to watch the 4.5ish hour count, as I was interrupted a fair few times at home.

 

Edited by Jerry_Atrick
  • Like 1
  • Informative 2
Posted
1 hour ago, nomadpete said:

Thanks for the summary Jerry. Must have been a multi wolfie marathon, staying up to follow the coverage. I admit to tuning out - it's all too far away to affect us in  our safe little liberal enclave

Are you sure it’s safe?

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

Just work out who is making money as a result of the story they put out. They are the ones that had all the "voice 'in Morrissons  minions.   Part time lackeys. Best Pollies Money can buy.  Nev

  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Jerry_Atrick said:

I love election counts for some reason.

Same here Jerry, totally addicted to them. I make an event of watching election night coverage. It has all the elements for good entertainment - watching democracy in action, tearing down tall poppies, backing the underdog, seeing jaws drop, booing the dickhead.

 

One of the silliest nights I've seen was Bill Shorten's loss to that person we don't want to know. The Labor supporters at their election night base were popping the champagne before the polls had closed, so sure they were of victory based on all the leading poll trends over the months previous. Within the hour they all looked like stunned mullets, milling about like passengers staggering out of a train wreck.

 

Another crazy one was a Qld. state election years ago. The sitting Nationals thought they could screw Labor by preferencing One Nation over Labor. The result was Hanson took about a dozen seats from the Nats who've never recovered their vote base to this day. There wasn't many ON members left by the end of the term. Most of them were funny farm material. It was amusing watching the first parliament sit with a big block of weirdos all grouped together and both the Nats and Labor staring daggers at them. Pauline thought she was hot stuff, but the reality was only one of them won on first preferences. The rest were only there as a result of the Nats preference deal. The Nationals never did that again.

  • Like 3
Posted

Looks like the euphoria that encompassed the NSW ALP may be a little subdued as enough of the in-doubt seats went to the Libs despite big swings to Labor. Looks like it's minority rule, but I prefer that as long as the cross-benchers are reasonable - and not of the ilk of Mark Latham.. Geez, if Hanson to labelled something as disgusting; it must have been vile.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Now we have to see which way the Independents move. My seat is held by an Independent, but  being  ex-Shooters & Fishers, I reckon he'd be a bit of a Red, and I don't mean a Red under the Bed type red.

  • Informative 1
Posted

Morrison is about to take a new job apparently in the USA. BY election for Cooke?  Sleep easy Dutton. They reckon there's no one else and that's why you are safe. . THAT must be re assuring??  Nev

  • Informative 2
Posted

Winning Cook might be a hard task at the moment. Cook covers three State seats. One os Kogarah - Minn's big win, the other two, Miranda and Cronulla remained Lib, but with appreciable swings away from the Libs.

 

We live in interesting times.

  • Informative 2
Posted
7 hours ago, facthunter said:

Morrison is about to take a new job apparently in the USA. BY election for Cooke? 

In any other line of work, you’d be severely penalised financially for jumping ship from a job you had recently applied for and won.

He asked to be elected representative of a group of people. Now we have to go through the expense of doing it all again. 
 

The cost of the by-election should be taken from his pension.

  • Agree 3
  • Winner 1
Posted

I do agree, OK, but in fairness, a sitting ex-PM is usually a lame duck (or, in SFM's case, lame dick, IMHO). It is not uncommon for ex PMs to resign their seat in the aftermath of a loss.. I am surprised he took so long to do it given the magnitude of his loss.  He has lost virtually all political capital - and I would say that of his own party as well as the incoming government. SO I would cut some slack in this case, but not for the length of tiume he took. He certainly comes aross as a parasite.

 

As for his new job. I am happy for him and his employer, as there is every reason to suggest he will cost them as much, iof not more than all of his previous employers.. They really should do more homework.

  • Informative 1
Posted

His ego has obviously recovered from his election loss. Just the sort of scam non-job his talents suit him for. Good riddance.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Posted

Their "example" hasn't put their church in a great light. By the fruit there of will the tree be judged. Bugger their constituents. They were just a means to an end.. I hope they realise it when the BUY election is held and a "never again " move takes place. Nev

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

The usual verbal diarrhoea from Morrison, he said joining the Worldwide Speakers Group would help facilitate his ‘growing relationships within the private sector’. That's Morrison speak for "hopefully it might land me a job somewhere".

 

onetrack's link should be in the comedy section. It looks like they get to write their own bio; either that or the WWSG are not too bright.

Some of the highlights:

-the true definition of a leader with a 360-degree worldview

-a globalisation mastermind

-known for providing measured geopolitical leadership

-aggressively working toward a net zero global emissions economy

 

I wonder how many speeches he will make before the WWSG realise they've hired an absolute moron.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

That was a while ago. I'm not sure this is the same job. He performs consistently at stuffing things up by mismanagement (and worse) .He's not getting much support or Praise.  Time wounds all Heels. Nev

  • Informative 1
Posted

I would have voted independent. I can see how parties developed, but I don't have to like the idea and so I vote for small parties or independents these days. I am a member of "Sustainable Australia " and we lost our only seat in the Vic election. I thought the guy had done a good job.... alas, the electorate disagreed.

  • Informative 2
Posted

Parties when transparent develop Policies which member input contribute to. WIth the LNP the ordinary person cannot be allowed to know what the "ARRANGEMENT" between the 2 Paries IS. It's proven to be an unholy alliance which beneifits the NPs as they can blackmail the Libs and do. Nev

  • Agree 1
  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...