Popular Post Jerry_Atrick Posted August 12, 2023 Popular Post Posted August 12, 2023 (edited) I have to admit, I haven't paid too much attention to the women's world cup. I mean, why would I? I stopped following football (soccer) years ago as it had become cringeworthy of the antics the men’s game would pull, and of course, the corruption of FIFA, and the Qatar world cup, etc. In a rare occurrence these days, I switched on the TV and on the first channel was the Matildas v. France. It was the 70th minute and nil-all. I thought I would watch it and see what happens... and wow! what a game. It finished maybe 1.5 hours later as it went into extra time and then penalties. It took no less than 10 penalties each (according to the commentator - I lost count) to decide the game - in the Matilda's favour. As the game wore on and into extra time, the Matildas seem to tire ahead of France, the passes were a little off, the chases longer, and at times a little panic seemed to settle in. The ball remained in their half (France's attacking half), and they were resilient and resolute in defence. There was an own goal by the Matildas that was disallowed as they defender who was going to make contact, with the ball was dragged off it by a French forward, What I really loved about the game was that it represented much that the men’s game doesn't. Yeah - it was a little slower and what few shots they managed to put on goal (due to excellent defence of both teams) were not quite as powerful as the men’s but wow, they game was hard fought, full of great skills, excellent tactics (although the Matildas have to learn to go wider in attack to open the centre up a bit), the women didn't easily go to ground and when they did, for the most part they got straight back up - the times they did stay fallen looked like they got some decent knocks. As the Matildas tired, the French seemed the classier side, but the Matildas just kept at it - mental and physical perseverance. No doubt, the home ground advantage played its part, as well. No goal was scored during the normal game; and the penalty shootout could not have been filled with more suspense. It really could have gone any way. France opened the penalty shoot-outs by opening door to the Aussies - the French had their very first shot saved. It looked like it was going to be all over after the first five penalties, but for some reason, the Aussie goal keeper was selected to kick the fifth and managed to find the right hand post. After each teams' first five penalties, each team takes a penalty - one at a time (France took the first). They went toe to toe; France missed one; maybe two, but Australia duly missed the follow up that could have won them the game. Then, on France's 10th penalty, a commentator remarked that they were quite a way down the order and the players stepping up are not meant to take penalties. A young French woman - 19 years of age, ran up and sold the Matilda's keeper a dummy - sending the keeper diving the opposite direction of where she slotted the ball. Sadly, for her, and France, she dragged it ever-so slightly wide and hit the left upright dead-on. Even as an Aussie, my heart sank for her. The Australian player - a player for Sydney United FC lined up and kicked the penalty of the night to finally take an opportunity France availed to the Matildas. No one could script as dramatic a penalty shoot-out as the one that unfolded that evening. In fact, I was settling down in preparation for this battle to last a few more hours. What I really loved about the game was how genuine the game was; no attempting to manipulate situations outside the rules to gain the advantage; no diving or theatrics at the most minor contact; just sportspeople having a good, honest crack at the game, battling it out and then just then you thought they were spent, somehow finding reserves in their tanks to push through. I haven't watched a game of soccer for a long time, but this was a joy to watch - somewhat inspirational even to an old fella like me. I would pay good money to watch a game live - but would still not bother with the men’s shenanigans, which is more like a slapstick comedy in my humble opinion. So congrats to the Matildas, and heartfelt commiserations to the French team - if there was ever an honourable loss, that was one of them. I was also surprised to be informed that many, if not most of our Matildas play for top European and British teams - way to go! For the French - sadly it is on the way home (I do hope they try some of our non-exported wines before they go). For the Matildas - England or Colombia Edited August 12, 2023 by Jerry_Atrick 4 1 1
Old Koreelah Posted August 12, 2023 Posted August 12, 2023 Jerry I agree totally. I usualy switch channels when sport comes on, but women’s teams like soccer and cricket are far more interesting to watch than the men. Real sportsmanship when you see them help a fallen opponent (and our girls have been supportive of all women being paid what they’re worth). The teams defeated by our Matildas can go home with their heads held high. Another thing: lets stick it to the evil Taliban, who grind down their womenfolk at every opportunity. Australia hosts the Afghan Women’s team, who should be recognised by FIFA. https://www.smh.com.au/sport/meet-the-women-who-escaped-the-taliban-and-now-play-for-melbourne-victory-20230608-p5deys.html https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/afghan-womens-football-team-a-symbol-of-resistance-against-taliban-repression/ 2 1
old man emu Posted August 12, 2023 Posted August 12, 2023 Jerry, Where will your loyalties lie on Wednesday when it's Australia -v- England? And in Sydney. 2
Jerry_Atrick Posted August 13, 2023 Author Posted August 13, 2023 Well, this is going to sound like a cop out... But, it really is a case of may the best team win. But, if push came to shove, as I am looking to move back to Australia, at a pinch it would be the Matilda's. My sporting allegiences between my dual citizenship are: Cricket - Australia Mens soccer - England Mens Rugby - England Everything else - Australia 1
nomadpete Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 (edited) Glad you cleared that up Jerry. Your visa will now be approved. Will you be applying for visitor, tourist, worker or residency? Edited August 13, 2023 by nomadpete 2
Marty_d Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 As a platinum level consumer of Wolf Blass, I think Jerry has funded whatever class visa he wants. 1 1
Jerry_Atrick Posted August 13, 2023 Author Posted August 13, 2023 4 hours ago, nomadpete said: Will you be applying for visitor, tourist, worker or residency? Sportsperson visa 1
Popular Post willedoo Posted August 15, 2023 Popular Post Posted August 15, 2023 The politicians are putting the cart before the horse. They're all arguing about whether we should have a public holiday if the Matildas win the World Cup. A bit silly to argue about it when they haven't even played the semi-final yet. 5
spacesailor Posted August 15, 2023 Posted August 15, 2023 How.about a ' day off ' for mourning their loss ! . Inleu of the winners ' day-off ' . LoL spacesailor 1 2
nomadpete Posted August 15, 2023 Posted August 15, 2023 The politicians are always on the lookout for anything to distract Joe public from their usual antics. 4
willedoo Posted August 16, 2023 Posted August 16, 2023 I never normally watch soccer games, but watching the Matildas the other night got me wondering why heading the ball hasn't been banned yet. It will be eventually; it's just a matter of when. Other football codes are starting to get serious about head injuries in the game, but soccer is still allowing multiple repetitive blows to the head in every match. The head blows during the game are only part of it. Add to that the number of weekly training sessions and the amount of practice in heading the ball during those sessions, and you get quite a high number of blows to the head every week. Research has shown that small repetitive blows to the head can do a lot of accumulative damage. You might not see the result for another twenty or thirty years, but a certain number of players will eventually end up with dementia like conditions directly attributable to repeated blows to the head. 1 1 1
willedoo Posted August 16, 2023 Posted August 16, 2023 On another note, soccer is such a low scoring game that you can duck away from the TV for a minute and miss the only goal in the entire match. I think the difficulty in scoring is what builds the tension. Tension = excitement = fanatical fans. 2
facthunter Posted August 16, 2023 Posted August 16, 2023 Needs a good umpire. Why support England?. Tony A Bot was a 10 pound POM. I'll kick in a tenner if he will GO BACK.. Nev 1
red750 Posted August 16, 2023 Posted August 16, 2023 Sorry Nev, but you are starting to sound like a cracked record. We all know you have no time for Abbott.
Old Koreelah Posted August 16, 2023 Posted August 16, 2023 13 hours ago, willedoo said: On another note, soccer is such a low scoring game that you can duck away from the TV for a minute and miss the only goal in the entire match. I think the difficulty in scoring is what builds the tension. Tension = excitement = fanatical fans. Rugby League games have enough violence on the field, so the fans tend to go home peacefully. Soccer games build up so much frustration that, on their way home, fans sometimes trash the town. 1 1 1
Marty_d Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 Looked like a very civilised crowd last night. Showed English and Australian fans being quite amiable. 1 1
spacesailor Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 Except for the ' vandals ' wrecking the trains . spacesailor
facthunter Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 It was a really good game and the Poms were the better team on the day. Oz goalkeeper is a big assett. We did well to come as far as we have. Nev 3
old man emu Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 I felt sorry for Ms Kerr. I know that her position is Striker, and the Striker is supposed to be the one who does the scoring, but you've got to feel for teh stress she is carrying. Basically, the whole outcome depends on her. The rest of the players are meant to get her into a scoring position. At least in the oval ball games, each player stands a chance of worrying the score-keepers.
red750 Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 Not that I even watched it on TV, but the thousands that watched it at Fed Square ruined it, stampeding and throwing flares. Fed Sq. closed for the next game. I don't go to sporting matches. Not because I'm getiing older, but you see more of the game and replays, from the comfort of the armchair, and don't pay ripoff prices for your refreshments.
Jerry_Atrick Posted August 17, 2023 Author Posted August 17, 2023 (edited) Sadly for the Matilda's, their campaign ended (OK. they are playing for third on Saturday, but the big prize is gone), but they should be proud of what they achieved. Sadly, as I was in the office when it was on, I didn't get to see it. But I did see Kerr's goal and it was a cracker. Yes, it is hard to get a goal in soccer, but that makes the excitement of when good ones come that more intense - and of course so are those near misses. There are a couple of more girls who are on European club radars now, and that is great for them. While Kerr is the media's favourite, my was the compact player, Fowler. She is only 20 but, from what I saw at least, was a cut above the rest in skill. In a couple of years, she will challenge Kerr for the mantle. Strangely, women's soccer doesn't quite have the same level of interest here as it does in Aus. I guess as it is playing in Aus, and the Matildas have gone further than probably most thought, it is capturing the imagination of the nation. After the World Cup and the players have settled, I may take the daughter to a game over here to see one of the Aussies in action. I would expect the language in the spectators not to be quite as colourful as in the men's games. Edited August 17, 2023 by Jerry_Atrick 1
willedoo Posted August 19, 2023 Posted August 19, 2023 Well, that's it, Albo jinxed it with the public holiday thing; not even a Bronze. At least now the pollies can get back in their shoeboxes. 2 1
Jerry_Atrick Posted August 19, 2023 Author Posted August 19, 2023 I switched the game on at about the 20 minute mark, just as the Matilda tripped the Swede in the 11 yard box. At first I thought Aus was in the yellow strip and even then, I thought the trip was soft and a penalty should not be awared to (what I thought was going to be) Australia. I was a little confused when they called it for Sweden - then it dawned on me the Swedes were in the yellow jerseys. I expected a response from Australia, and they did up the physicality, but it is clear they were pretty well riled by the decision and let it get to them. I don't know how they were playing before I started watching, but their decision making was off, and their skills had fallen away, but what was telling to me was that quite a few seem to play a little more selfishly. When the easy ball was to pass to a team mate, they often decided to take on the opponent. It was clear they were a tired unit and they got beaten in the one-on-ones almost all the ftime. That is when you realise they had mentally lost it. For example, when shots are taken, The Swedes, on the other hand, played with a lot more composure, even when under a little mpre physical pressure after th penalty. Their second goal was a beauty, although made easier be an Aussie defence that was wrong footed. The Swedes looked fater, and when they had posession, they were more in control, their passing was accurate, and their decision making was better. They didn't look as tired. Despite this, Australia had a decent amount of posession, but they were never threatening when they had it - Sweden seemed happy to let them have it until Australia got almost within a whiff of being threatening. This was a time for the Matildas to step up a gear, but as the British commentator remarked, "they are a young an inexperienced team and will learn from this how to account for themselves in the big moments." It could be that Australia does does not have the depth of players, or that Gustaveson was too narrowly focused on a few players, because there were very few changes to the lineups during the course of the world cup, and in the games there were few substitutions. For a home side, that is almost creiminal, but in today's game, he took our stonger performers off to put fresh legs on.. that was not lost on the commentary either. Immensly proud of the women. They may not have won a medal, but they achieved so much more. For women, they have shown they are amongst the best in the world. Even when Australia had its superstars dotted all over Europe, they couldn't make it to the quarter finals, let alone the semis - and that was with a lot more cash thrown at them than the women (Remember Gus Hudink - the coach of the men's team - they paid him a king's ransom). The Aussie government is kicking in $200M to further develop womens suport in Aus solely on the Matilda's performance. So, a netball world cup win and the AFLW wasn't enough.. the Matildas captured the spirit of the nation as the underdog that never gives up. And they have attracted an endearing fan base. Australia's largest ever TV audience for the semis, and not a bad one for the bronze. And I can tell you, there is nowhere near the exxcitement in England of their Lionesses being in the fiknal of the world cup as there was of Australia being in any stage of the world cup. As one English player put it, "Wow! There were 75,000 people to a women;s game and the home side wasn't in it!". Are they household names? Maybe not to everyone, but to a lot more than a fringe group of supporters.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now