Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

It is just the sizes that have been corrected. Of course the image of each region is no longer the proportionate distance from its neighbours. The main message for me is that Russia is not all that big compared to Australia. 

Edited by pmccarthy
  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1
Posted

It Illustrates the Disortions of the Mercator Projection which get worse near each pole. The more common  and useful one is Lamberts Conformal Orthomorphic projection based on 2 selected parallels of Latitude   The only true representation is on a Globe, Nev

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Jerry_Atrick said:

According to Google, Russia is 17.1m sq kms; Australia is 7.688m sq km.

That sounds about right when looking at the image.

  • Like 1
Posted

Elon has launched Tesla's phone with a cost of US$273, or A$426 with supposedly more security and features than an iPhone, which ccost from $1500 to over $3000 at Costco.

 

It's called the Tesla Pi Phone (as in 𝞹 ).

  • Informative 1
Posted

I can't disagree with the particular example Nomad has highlighted, but I wonder if we are looking at a sort of 'chicken or the egg" situation. Toolmakers don't have tools to make until there is a factory to use them in. There is no need for a factory until there is a product to make, and the demand for that product. There is ne demand for a product until its price to the consumer makes it worthwhile to purchase.

 

At present, I see the best approach for Australia to take is to value-add to its raw materials. Admittedly that is the bottom of the manufacturing ladder, but I suspect that it is the easiest to start with. Thereafter, it might be possible to develop a manufacturing base that uses those value-added raw materials. Then the need for other skilled trades would develop.

  • Informative 2
Posted

When Hockey and Abbot told the Carmakers to P of they lost all the associated manufacturing connections and skills. Abbot said go and get a "DECENT" job and also said TAFE only Teaches Basket weaving..Nev

  • Informative 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 hours ago, old man emu said:

At present, I see the best approach for Australia take is to value-add to its raw materials. Admittedly that is the bottom of the manufacturing ladder

Quite agree, OME.

With only one caveat.....

We really need Australian ownership of raw material extraction AND the value adding processing.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Not so much a caveat, but a plan.

 

t would be a brave political party that put its foot down and declared that, come Hell or high water, it was going to pour funds into the establishment of these basic industries, and the training of personnel to create and operate them.

 

However, the Party needs to acknowledge that it expertise is in governing, not manufacturing. Therefore it needs to engage an expert in manufacturing to direct the project. This is how the USA won WWII. Not  through military ability, but by throwing a tsunami of manufactured goods at the Front Line. Remember what Churchill said to the American People in 1941, "Give us the tools, and we will finish the job. That was before the USA entered the war, but the idea was put into practice for the aid of the British Empire, and ramped up when the USA came into military conflict with the Empire of Japan.

 

This video is about 45 minutes long, but it shows how one man with expert knowledge fulfilled Churchill's plea.

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...