dazza 38 Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 Dazza: your leaps of logic leave me breathless at times. Malcolm Turnbull is a multimillionaire so in your view he's a great guy and must be very clever. Astonishing! He is a SELF MADE millionaire which is a hell of a lot better than a millionaire who got their money on a silver plater. Of course self maid millionaires are clever, otherwise then wouldn't have made that much money. I'm never said he was great, I don't personally know him. He may well be an ass hole.
Marty_d Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 Self Maid? Does that mean he makes his own tea and does his own dusting? Doubt it. (Good job he doesn't fly, he might use a Hanger...) (Sorry Dazza, couldn't resist!)
Robbo Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 He made money during the internet boom of the 90's with ozemail.. Yet he screws the nbn? Suppose he is only used of dialup....
Litespeed Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 There are Labor supporters, extreme Labor supporters, then there's Litespeed. Ah......................... Sorry. I am not a labor supporter at all. But I am a supporter of any party that take the interest of the people that elect them seriously and do not do the bidding of the wealthy powerful elites. If the Nats were serious about helping rural communities and the average punter they might even get my vote. I vote for whoever is actually about caring for the humans rather than corporations. At the moment that seems the greens.
Jaba-who Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 He made money during the internet boom of the 90's with ozemail.. Yet he screws the nbn? Don't think you can hold that against him. The NBN was doomed the moment it started. It was always going to be behind time, over-budget and eventually to probably be superseded by other technology but we'll be stuck with it. It's like most giant infra-structure projects - controlled by large numbers of divergent self-interest groups and modified a bit by each successive group who get a foothold. The politicians ( including whoever was in charge when labour started it ) are always trying to please too many noisy self interested people. But while it is running at the forefront ( which probably won't be long) it has already been researched to suggest we will have paid a couple of hundred billion for almost universally high speed porn and you tube videos. The claimed major uses that have been the justifiers for it can actually do what they need to do with lower speeds and less bandwidth. Even now youtube and porn counts for most australian bandwidth.
DrZoos Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 Litespeed thats a classic....becuase if the greens actually got in power the economy would be so screwed that you would wish and dream for some coorporate greed to exist...seriously dude some of what they say they stand for is admirrable, but the policies they have and even in the limited detail they provide there are gaping holes... Just one example. They want solar on all social housing ( hopefully the rock proof kind of glass because where I live virtually anything made of glass within 2 km of the social housing area is broken) and they want 50 % of it produced in Australia (admirable but not at all realistic) ... Why would we set up a short term solar manufacturing industry at high cost with high wages only to close it back down again , when China produces high quality low xost solar....we would be better off spending that money on china solar panels and with the money we save, we spend on creating jobs in an area we we actually have a long term sustainable competitive advantage....eg solar research or solar engineering, not manufacturing...stupid stupid stupid
kaz3g Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 Hi guys Just a reminder that our host (the owner of this list) is not a multi-millionaire with all his assets located in Guernsey. Please think before you post defamatory statements about people who have all the resources in the world to make life unpleasant for you and him. Kaz
eightyknots Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 For those with short memories- Malcom Turnbull is a merchant banker. You remember the GFC- it was caused by merchant bankers and their engineering of financial markets. The modern snake oil salesmen. Oh and don't forget the One Tel debacle that cost people billions and Malcom made a handy profit from the whole thing. Some expensive lawyers and smoke and mirrors meant he did not get a jail sentence. Or the Gordon Gretch affair. Yep about as trustworthy as a pedophile running a kindergarten. More like giving Christopher Skase the keys for him to look after the gold bullion at the Reserve Bank.
fly_tornado Posted September 16, 2015 Author Posted September 16, 2015 The NBN is a worthwhile use of our taxes, generous tax breaks through super for the rich is not. O'm on the NBN and its much faster than my ADSL2
eightyknots Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 I think I am going back to spending more time on the non-political threads in this great forum.
Marty_d Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 Thanks fellas, mistake fixed. Half fixed.
Robbo Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 The NBN is a worthwhile use of our taxes, generous tax breaks through super for the rich is not. O'm on the NBN and its much faster than my ADSL2 Its flucates that much.... This the good tests on fixed wireless.... Just did a test now and im getting 6.5 download and 0.5 upload.. [ATTACH]47715._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]47716._xfImport[/ATTACH]
coljones Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 the libs have slowly been swallowing up Nationals seats, the biggest threat to the Nationals will always be the Libs. One would like to think so but in Qld with the merge of the Liberal Party and the National Party it has been back to the dark ages with the old country party, ghosts of Joh, being rampant.
coljones Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 The biggest threat to everyone is not the libs or labour its the extremes...greens and Barnardi etc PUP Im all for environmental issues, but i hate when a bunch of anti everything extremists calls themselves greens and get huge votes from lots of people who dont even know or agree with 2/3rds of thier policies.. Don't presume that any voter supports more than just a few of any party's policies. This talk of an electoral mandate is a fraud, but they all do it.
coljones Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 Don't think you can hold that against him. The NBN was doomed the moment it started. It was always going to be behind time, over-budget and eventually to probably be superseded by other technology but we'll be stuck with it. It's like most giant infra-structure projects - controlled by large numbers of divergent self-interest groups and modified a bit by each successive group who get a foothold. The politicians ( including whoever was in charge when labour started it ) are always trying to please too many noisy self interested people. But while it is running at the forefront ( which probably won't be long) it has already been researched to suggest we will have paid a couple of hundred billion for almost universally high speed porn and you tube videos. The claimed major uses that have been the justifiers for it can actually do what they need to do with lower speeds and less bandwidth. Even now youtube and porn counts for most australian bandwidth. The NBN was all about equity of access. The old copper and caox systems are aging rapidly and need tobe replaced to sutain the sorts of speeds now being demanded. It appeared that Telstra, sick and tired of being screwed over as the only carrier obliged to provide infrastructure was unlikely to stump up the cash to upgrade the service to support the new speeds if bit players like optus were to come in and pay pay pitiful low ACCC mandated charges on the infrastructure that Telstra paid for. This maent that on thin routes such as country towns. villages and hamlets were never going to get adequate services unless they were propped up with government money - hence NBN. In a lot of areas the copper is failing. When it was just phones one could get inventive to re-use the capacity but eventually it has to be replaced and the obvious solution is fibre to the home and you need to do it street by street, not just house by house (and fix up the pipes, ducts and pits as you go). As with anything - like a new ship, an aircraft or a road you can't use it till it is complete. The NBN, like a fleet of ships or aircraft, gets rolled out a bit at a time but the upfront costs are huge, particularly for a complete new highly novel, properly engineered and complicated design - the NBN also needs the support infrastructure in place well before the last customer is hooked up.
dazza 38 Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 Yeah, two maids and a silver plater. Silver plating a platter no doubt. Yes I was being very specific.
Teckair Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 [ATTACH=full]37941[/ATTACH] Et tu, Brute? From my side, the same sentiment applies to the Conservatives. OME Yep bird brain.
DrZoos Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 the NBN also needs the support infrastructure in place well before the last customer is hooked up. Not entirely correct... Its done like a patchwork quilt with each segment being connected and operational one at a time... ie they lay the fibre from one town to the next, then roll out the fibre round that town/area, then connect it to the www one town or area at a time
Guest Andys@coffs Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 He's not talking about suburb based infrastructure, but rather the multi DataCenter core switching Infrastructure and overarching management and control infrastructure which, as you know, isn't a couple of DLink SOHO Boxes but rather something of capacity to scale to whole of Australia size....when there is only a few suburbs rolled out, as now, then I suspect that the core infrastructure as a percentage of their total cost structure is much higher per node than it will be towards the end..... I also suspect the significant blow outs in cost are likely a function of falling AUD to USD FX conversion rates......The reality is that high tech whether sold in AUD or not is all tied back to USD........Of course you can hedge at the time you decide to go ahead, but you don't get nothing for nothing and the costs when talking $B will be significant so I wouldn't be surprised if we were simply exposed to market movements......
coljones Posted September 17, 2015 Posted September 17, 2015 Not entirely correct...Its done like a patchwork quilt with each segment being connected and operational one at a time... ie they lay the fibre from one town to the next, then roll out the fibre round that town/area, then connect it to the www one town or area at a time I said "the NBN also needs the support infrastructure in place well before the last customer is hooked up." LAST MEANS LAST but like all construction projects there is a lot you need to do BEFORE you put the front door on, part of which is the rest of the community and the road to the outside world not just to the next village.
Russ Posted September 17, 2015 Posted September 17, 2015 [ATTACH]47717._xfImport[/ATTACH] .....bugger
fly_tornado Posted September 17, 2015 Author Posted September 17, 2015 everyone having a laugh at us!
fly_tornado Posted September 18, 2015 Author Posted September 18, 2015 it just keeps going: Scott Morrison offered the treasurer to stay loyal to Abbott. Hockey won't be pleased http://www.2gb.com/audioplayer/128626
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now