Jerry_Atrick Posted February 16 Posted February 16 Albo to theh rescue? Albo to the rescue of entrenching a two-party system: 1 1
Grumpy Old Nasho Posted February 16 Posted February 16 On 16/02/2025 at 11:48 AM, Jerry_Atrick said: Albo to the rescue of entrenching a two-party system Expand The desperation from the ALP and the Coalition is climbing to greater heights. Not long ago they ruled that the minimum number of members in minor parties be increased to 1,500 from 500. What will they come up with next, ban minor parties altogether? ... in Australia's best interest? 1
nomadpete Posted February 16 Posted February 16 On 16/02/2025 at 12:30 PM, Grumpy Old Nasho said: What will they come up with next, ban minor parties altogether? .. Expand That appears to be their goal. I'd rather see all political parties banned. Then decisions could be made democratically . 2
facthunter Posted February 16 Posted February 16 The "Independents' are NOT a PARTY. They are funded by Climate 200 run by Holmes A Court, Nev 1
Marty_d Posted February 16 Posted February 16 Even with compulsory voting it's hard enough to get people to vote properly (ie not make a donkey vote either deliberately or accidentally). Without political parties and people not spending the time to understand the candidates, how the hell are they going to make their vote go even vaguely in the direction they want? At the risk of opening a huge can of worms, maybe we need a better way of voting. Candidates clearly mark where they stand on a range of current and likely future issues (and are held publicly to account if they then vote differently without sufficient reason). The vote is also simply a questionnaire about where the voter stands on the same range of issues. Then your vote is assigned to the candidate whose profile most accurately reflects your choices. 1
facthunter Posted February 16 Posted February 16 They'd whinge like all get out if they weren't allowed to vote. The majority of Australian Politicians are decent people. There's a few in it for the "spoils" of office. THEY give the rest a BAD name. Parties develop Policies from the input of their rank and file (Ideally). Some represent Coal mines and Big money. Nev 1
nomadpete Posted February 17 Posted February 17 On 16/02/2025 at 10:37 PM, Marty_d said: a better way of voting. Expand Don't worry. It's on It's way now. A.I. can scan the sentiment of the public, filter out the radicals, and tell us who we really need. 1
Grumpy Old Nasho Posted February 17 Posted February 17 On 16/02/2025 at 11:50 PM, facthunter said: Parties develop Policies from the input of their rank and file (Ideally) Expand That's been the major problem all along. A party has it's own policies, that differ from other parties, giving rise to fighting over control of the Treasury. The electorate needs to have the power to block the money supply (it's our money), until consensus is reached in Parliament on the best way to go forward with policy selection and implementation, with all players having an equal say and equal participation.
Marty_d Posted February 17 Posted February 17 The problem is that the people have even less idea of what the money is needed for than the parliament. So if you give the population at large the ability to block spending you'll get the same awful outcomes currently happening in the US where idiots without a clue are mindlessly breaking stuff in the mantra of "save money". (For who? Billionaires) 1 1 1
facthunter Posted February 17 Posted February 17 (edited) GON, After the Frazer-Whitlam supply blocking, Most sensible people won't ever go down that track again HERE by general agreement . Look at the utter CHAOS in the USA by contrast. Unintended consequences your HERO wouldn't THINK of. He's a bit LIGHT in the Thinking and Knowing department. He's a Real Estate Wheeler and Dealer. Nev Edited February 17 by facthunter expand 2
old man emu Posted February 17 Posted February 17 On 17/02/2025 at 2:40 AM, facthunter said: He's a Real Estate Wheeler and Dealer. Expand That's where he got his on International Relations policy from. If you look at what he wants to do in various places, it reflects the mentality of a real estate wheeler dealer. 1 2
pmccarthy Posted February 17 Author Posted February 17 I suggest reading “The moon is a harsh mistress “ by Heinlein in about 1960 on AI taking over politically. It could also do animated simulation of its persona on TV.
Jerry_Atrick Posted February 17 Posted February 17 There certainly is a lot of AI in politics these days.
old man emu Posted February 17 Posted February 17 On 17/02/2025 at 8:32 AM, Jerry_Atrick said: There certainly is a lot of AI in politics these days. Expand AI and BS, not to mention also, smoke and mirrors.
facthunter Posted February 17 Posted February 17 That's the advertising Industry. Hansard records ALL that is said in real time. Nev
facthunter Posted March 20 Posted March 20 WHO actually DID ATTEND a Fundraiser when Albo was shuffling sandbags with the Qld LNP Premier in the WET? Wrong Button Dutton. Nev 1 1
Jerry_Atrick Posted Saturday at 09:25 PM Posted Saturday at 09:25 PM That was the point of the vid... Funny how most people don't look beyond a headline, and in a time with MSM as echo chambered as social meeja, and with the ability to find the trueth with a few more clicks, but they don't.. well.. they get what they deserve.. Sadly they take us with them.
nomadpete Posted Saturday at 10:32 PM Posted Saturday at 10:32 PM On 22/03/2025 at 9:25 PM, Jerry_Atrick said: Sadly they take us with them. Expand Sadly we collectively follow without proper thought or debate. Unfortunately the modern voter prefers a noisy hollow candidate, to a quiet, more effective candidate. Not that the incumbent is dogs gift to the country. But he hasn't made any noisy grandiose blunders either. 1 1
spacesailor Posted Saturday at 10:41 PM Posted Saturday at 10:41 PM " Blunders ". Like trying to split Australia into a dual ' citizen ' country . that cost my vote . I certainly don't want a country like Ireland.. Maybe good to live there , if you don't upset the opposition. spacesailor
Jerry_Atrick Posted Saturday at 11:26 PM Posted Saturday at 11:26 PM You either misread what the voice was about or was duped.. but nothing anyone can say will change your mind.,, so it may well be prejudice.. But go ahead and vote against your own interest based on a hollow culture war
facthunter Posted Saturday at 11:32 PM Posted Saturday at 11:32 PM The Media Here is the Main thing WRONG with Australia, IF it did it's job properly, the rest would fall into place. Nev 1
spacesailor Posted Sunday at 12:06 AM Posted Sunday at 12:06 AM The " voice ''. " native committees " telling the " elected " government how the country will be run ( in their way ) . Sound about right .Similar to NZ two court system. spacesailor
facthunter Posted Sunday at 12:13 AM Posted Sunday at 12:13 AM Stop reading Murdoch . It will DO your Brain in. Nev
Jerry_Atrick Posted Sunday at 05:49 AM Posted Sunday at 05:49 AM (edited) On 23/03/2025 at 12:06 AM, spacesailor said: The " voice ''. " native committees " telling the " elected " government how the country will be run ( in their way ) . Sound about right .Similar to NZ two court system. spacesailor Expand You just proved my point.. no idea what you're talking about. But use your ignorance to vote against your own interests.. but don't complain when you get what you voted for Edited Sunday at 05:50 AM by Jerry_Atrick 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now