Bruce Tuncks Posted July 21 Posted July 21 I have been looking at the current situation regarding gambling in Australia and I doubt that the govt is really trying to stamp it out at all. What if anybody associated with a gambler ( wife, landlord, employer comes to mind as easy choices to start with ) could get his name added to a list? Then, anybody who took money from somebody on the list could have to refund it. Of course you would need protections to ensure that only problem gamblers were on the list and not just anybody who was disliked by the lister lot, but this would be possible if not so easy. Maybe they are afraid of unintended outcomes, like making more robberies happen?
spacesailor Posted July 21 Posted July 21 But " robberies " are a gamble . Only the rich make them pay ,( robberies ) that is . spacesailor 1
facthunter Posted July 21 Posted July 21 They ROB you legally with monopolies. There's NO gamble if you have all the moves covered and deals well oiled. Nev
Jerry_Atrick Posted July 21 Posted July 21 Brings too much money to the industry and the government to want to stamp it out. Plus Gaming NSW, for example, apparently has a hell of a lot of clout. 1
Bruce Tuncks Posted July 22 Author Posted July 22 I was amazed to see how California lived with legalized gambling in neighboring Nevada without following suit like they would in Australia.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now