Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, onetrack said:

Who would've guessed that Boy George could be so prophetic!?

One could argue that a makeup-wearing, cross-dressing boy in the 80's was always going to be ahead of his time!

  • Like 2
Posted

I don't think you will find any photos of Boy George that show him as a cross-dresser. Outrageously flamboyant, especially with his hats, but his clothing was usually basically male - coat and trousers. As for make-up, think KISS, Alice Cooper, The Performer Formerly Known as Prince.

  • Agree 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The Nostradamus of U.S. presidential elections has predicted a winner when the country goes to the polls in November.

 

Pollsters will no doubt swing back and forth between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump as the race comes down to the wire, but Allan Lichtman has history on his side.

 

The American University history professor and former quiz champion has forecast the White House winner in almost every election since 1984. The exception was in 2000, when he picked Al Gore over George W. Bush, although Lichtman did claim his model was then based on the popular vote, which Gore narrowly won.

 

In 2016, he accurately predicted that Trump would overcome Hillary Clinton and was rewarded with a handwritten note from the winner saying. “GOOD CALL!”

 

Now 77, Lichtman put his system to the test with the 2024 candidates, and Trump won’t be sending him a congratulatory message this time.

 

“The Democrats will hold on to the White House and Kamala Harris will be the next president of the United States,” the septuagenarian soothsayer told The New York Times.

  • Like 1
  • Informative 2
Posted

Vladimir Putin has just confirmed he wants Kamala Harris to be the next president of the US in a moment of typical Kremlin trolling.

 

The Russian president told an economic forum in the country’s far east that it was up to the American public to choose their next leader, but that he would recommend his supporters back Harris.

 

“She laughs so expressively and infectiously that it means that everything is fine with her,” he said on Thursday, suggesting this could mean she would not impose further sanctions against Russia.

 

This comment is clearly tongue-in-cheek. After all, Harris was the vice-president when the US ordered a ban on oil, gas and coal imports from Russia in 2022, in response to Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine.

 

And such seemingly affectionate remarks are at odds with the tensions between the US and Russia, which have only been rising since Putin started the war.

 

Only on Wednesday this week, the US justice department charged two Russian media executives over an alleged illegal scheme to influence the upcoming presidential election with pro-Russia propaganda – allegations Moscow denies.

 

Putin also endorsed outgoing president Joe Biden back in February, before he dropped out and was replaced by Harris.

 

In a similarly wry moment, he claimed Biden was a more “old school” politician than his Republican opponent Donald Trump, saying: “He’s more experienced, he’s predictable.”

 

Biden famously called Putin a “killer” in 2021, and has more recently called him a “murderous dictator” and a “pure thug”.

 

Trump, on the other hand, has regularly talked up his relationship with the Russian authoritarian leader, claiming to admire his “genius”.

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1
Posted

Those Russian media executives were funneling money to conservative pundits to make videos.  
I don't think they were encouraging people to vote for the Democrats.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

The stooge "journalists" had no idea they were paid $100k plus to write fake stories about the Democrats etc was dodgy.

 

I call Bullshit, they knew someone was paying to make up shit and push an agenda that is pro Ruski.

 

Since when do scribes get a sackful of gold for a story?

  • Like 2
  • Agree 2
Posted

The race for the White House is tightening up in two states previously thought to be solidly Republican.

 

Latest polls suggest the southern states of Texas and Florida, which Trump carried comfortably by 5 points and 4 points respectively in 2020, are now far closer than at any time in the race. 

 

Trump won Florida in both 2016 and 2020 securing 30 electoral votes, while Texas which has remained solidly red since 1976 was also won by Trump in 2020, garnering him 40 electoral college votes.

 

But the former president has seen his support erode among most demographic groups since his Democratic rival in the November 5 election, Vice President Kamala Harris, replaced President Joe Biden atop the Democratic ticket over the summer. 


Now in two states that were never considered swing states or toss-ups, things could be about to change with latest surveys from Emerson College suggesting Harris is now within the margin of error (about 3 points) in the two states.

 

The poll suggests Trump is only narrowly ahead in his home state of Florida at 50 percent with Harris at 45 percent.

 

In Texas things are even tighter with just 4 percentage points separating the pair at 50 percent compared to Harris' 46 percent, well within the margin of error.

 

Texas has remained a squarely red state since the late 1970s despite Democrats attempting to to turn the state blue.

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1
Posted

The problem is the Electoral College gerrymander the GOP has managed to refine - meaning that a presidential candidate can get a majority of the popular vote, but the EC gerrymander ensures it doesn't translate to a win. In 2016, Hilary Clinton got a higher percentage of the vote than Trump, but Trump still won, thanks to the crookedness of the EC voting system. It's electoral corruption at its finest.

  • Like 2
Posted

Russian president Vladimir Putin has claimed that he wants Kamala Harris to win the presidential election because President Joe Biden endorsed her - and because she has an “expressive and infectious laugh”. 

 

On Thursday, during the Eastern Economic Forum, the Russian president claimed that Biden was his “favorite” candidate but that since he dropped out he will now support the new Democratic nominee.

 

“Our favorite, if you can call it that, was the current president Mr. Biden,” Putin said, with a smirk.

 

“He was removed from the race, but he recommended that all his supporters support Ms. Harris. That’s what we’ll do too,” he said, according to a translation from Russian media outlet TASS.

 

He appeared to continue to mock Harris, adding: "She laughs so expressively and infectiously that it means that everything is fine with her”. The autocrat also said he hoped that means she would not introduce sanctions against Russia. 

 

Putin also claimed that “ultimately, the choice is up to the American people” and that Russia “will respect that”.

 

On Wednesday, the United States unsealed an indictment accusing Russia of attempting to influence the outcome of the 2024 presidential election.

 

Federal prosecutors allege that Putin’s allies directed Russian state media companies to disseminate misinformation and Russian propaganda online with the intent to try and influence this year’s election.

 

U.S. law enforcement agents seized 32 Russian-backed websites that were designed to boost Trump’s campaign. Two employees of the Russian state network RT were charged over allegedly launching a $10m propaganda scheme using American right-wing influencers.

 

On Thursday, federal prosecutors also unveiled an indictment against Trump’s 2016 campaign adviser and Russian expert, Dimitri Simes, alleging that he violated U.S. sanctions by working as a presenter at a Russian state TV station.

 

For several years, the U.S. has accused Russia of trying to influence its elections using misinformation and disinformation online and on social media. Intelligence reports concluded that Russia meddled in the 2016 election to help Trump win.

The Kremlin has repeatedly denied meddling in U.S. elections.

  • Informative 1
Posted (edited)

I watched it. I wouldn't say she knocked it out of the park but she did very well. It was notable that she looked at Trump a lot, but he never looked at her, just looked at the moderators. He must have been told not to look at her, because she was grinning at him a lot of the time, and it would probably have set him off even more. He trotted out all the usual lies, but at the same time seemed to do most of the talking. He never answered a direct question, of course. His supporters will say he walked all over her, but I think she did the job she had to and the Democrats should be happy. I just wish she had challenged him to turn and look at her just once. 

Edited by rgmwa
  • Like 1
  • Informative 2
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

If I were asked by a poller, I would pretend that I was going to vote for Trump. Remember how lots of hilaries voters didn't bother to come out, because they thought it was a foregone conclusion? I reckon Kamala is not making that same mistake.

Personally, I reckon it will not even be that close and Kamala will easily win.

Posted

She's a good operator.  It will be a truly damning indictment of the American people if they choose that lying criminal clown over her.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Posted

What I don't understand is the lackadaisical approach to voting.

We know there are more people in the US who don't like him than do.  All they have to do is get off their arse and vote. Isn't it worth it to keep that idiot from the top job and be the laughing stock of the world again?

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Kamala Harris isn’t pulling any punches these days, whether it be on Fox News or during her own rallies.

 

She proved this on Thursday at a rally in La Crosse, Wisconsin, when some protesters tried to disrupt her speech.

 

The vice president was talking about her opponent Donald Trump’s role in abortion bans across the country when the heckling started, but Harris stopped it as soon as it started.

“Oh, you guys are at the wrong rally,” she said. “I think you meant to go to the smaller one down the street.”

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted

I think a major part of the mindset of kamala supporters is ignore, but it's hard to ignore what is actually happening with the homeless the drug addicted and the gangs in major US Cities.

 

Trump may win very easily.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...