Questions over Joe Biden's presidency

[red750]

The Oversight Project has questioned who was making decisions during Joe Biden's presidency.

 

A review of all documents reputedly sgned by Biden revealed that the signatures are identical. This points to the fact that they may have been signed by an autopen. The only document where the signature varied slightly is the one where he announced he was standing down from the presidential campaign.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14479333/biden-autopen-president-signature-report.html?ito=social-facebook

 

 

 

 

[facthunter]

THAT's often done. My signature is terrible. . NO story there. THAT source is Crap anyhow. Nev

[red750]

Yeah, but the orange oaf is bound to make hay with it.

[old man emu]

 A quote from the Daily Mail article: according to a new report by an arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation,

 

"Isn't the Heritage Foundation the staunchest supporter of Joe Biden and the Democrats?", he asked wryly.

[facthunter]

Why refer to the Daily Mail? It's like quoting SKY.  Nev

[red750]

Nev, list the news sources I am allowed to look at so I don't make mistakes.

[old man emu]

4 hours ago, facthunter said:

Why refer to the Daily Mail? It's like quoting SKY.  Nev

If someone includes a link in a post to their source of information, then it behooves the reader to follow the link. I did, and that is how I found the words that I quoted. Haven't we been arguing that if one makes a statement in a post that it might need to be supported by a reference? 

[facthunter]

Why quote or obtain information from proven UNRELIABLE sources? Quoting the source is fine. I'm still NOT behoven to read it. I have no idea how you can make that assertion. OME. TRUTH is getting harder by the day to get.. Waste of time referencing it,  Be more selective. Nev

[pmccarthy]

If you only follow your own selected left wing sources, then you are living in an echo chamber and getting only half the information. I can read the Australian and the Age without my head exploding.

[facthunter]

I wouldn't follow unreliable left wing sources either. but they don't OWN newspapers. . I don't buy ANY newspapers since 1973,  You get VIEWS in the News media. Not much information.  Nev

[old man emu]

13 hours ago, facthunter said:

Why refer to the Daily Mail? It's like quoting SKY.  Nev

You missed the point of my original post. I said "he asked wryly". Couldn't you see that I was being ironic?

 

Left or Right, both sides have prostituted journalism. Therein lies the problem. What is one to believe? If one side says black, and the other say white, do we take it that the correct thing is grey?

[facthunter]

No. I just cannot understand your LOGIC. The admirable Journo's work in war zones etc and get off their Bums. The lesser ones sit and grow fat by keeping the OWNERS HAPPY putting out the CRAP we are accustomed to because there is a near monopoly. Qld being by far the worst, in that respect. When there's no news they make it up Nev

[red750]

At least it alerts you to something you may not have been aware of. You don't have to swallow their point of view, but it gives you an opportunity to check it out for yourself. If you don't know about it, you remain blissfully unaware.

[nomadpete]

1 hour ago, old man emu said:

What is one to believe? If one side says black, and the other say white, do we take it that the correct thing is grey?

I agree with most of your post except this bit. Due to the majority of media being paid by one flavour of info, the midpoint is not a true guess of truth.

[facthunter]

Lifes too short to look for facts in the Places where they don't value them. Why willingly submit to propaganda.?  It's NOT a MATTER of considering EQUALS.  Wou;d you believe  a used car salesman with a bad record?  or the Local village Idiot.  Nev