red750 Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 14 minutes ago, onetrack said: no amount of election speeches, or last-minute pork barrelling Add mudslinging and lying, like all other elections. 1
Jerry_Atrick Posted 22 hours ago Author Posted 22 hours ago I think for the vast majority of the electorate, their mind is rarely changed - takes someone like SFM to repulse people from their normal picks, and even then, many still hang on regardless. If people removed their conditioning and looked at the track records of each of the parties, you could be forgiven for thinking that the parties are not quite the stereotype they portray themselves to be. There was a write up in the FT today where an Egyptian billionaire is quitting the UK because of the removal of non-domiciled status which allows them to avoid paying taxes in the country they earned their income in, and then avoid paying taxes here. However, while the Labour treasurer, Rachel Reeves, is copping the blame for it, it was actually the conservatives that put in place the removal, and it was a vote carried forward by Labour. This billionaire attributed Britain's decline to the conservatives incompetence at handling the economy - which is the opposite of what they are stereotyped as. 1
facthunter Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago The last "contest" was fact checked. That's what always needs to be Done. Funny how some of the Media don't mention it. Nev
old man emu Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, Marty_d said: LNP have done a preference swap deal with Pauline Hanson If you are talking about the voting for the Senate, then your comment might only apply to your State. We would have to see if the same pattern exists in other States and Territories to see if the LNP did the same with One Nation across the whole country. However, it seem logical that the Parties of conservative nature would want to keep votes on that side of the divide.
Marty_d Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 37 minutes ago, old man emu said: If you are talking about the voting for the Senate, then your comment might only apply to your State. We would have to see if the same pattern exists in other States and Territories to see if the LNP did the same with One Nation across the whole country. However, it seem logical that the Parties of conservative nature would want to keep votes on that side of the divide. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-23/pauline-hanson-one-nation-preferencing-deal/105200748
old man emu Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Now, it appears the last two weeks (of the Australian election campaign) will be obscured by the funeral and succession of the only other man on Earth more famous than the first. And — for good measure — the funeral will be attended by both. Wouldn't it be great if they could arrange a double funeral? 1 1
spacesailor Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago I've just counted , six popes have died in my lifetime. I must count the Royal's next ! . But do you count the " abdicated king '' . No missed . So only three . spacesailor
Jerry_Atrick Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago This popped up in my YT feed. He admits he is biased to Labor, but if you want a summary of all the policies thus far of ALP, LNP, and GRN, then it seems pretty unbiased, and take your own opinion on them. 1
nomadpete Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Posted our votes in yesterday. I made sure of my preferences by voting Under The Line - as I have strong political opinions. 3
facthunter Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago We need more "thinking" Voters like you. I think I will wait till a lot closer to the date though. Nev
spacesailor Posted 31 minutes ago Posted 31 minutes ago I looked at the form ,a bunch of eight names without affiliations. So had to google them , as I wasn't the only one asking " who is Nicholas Matzen " . Never heard of him before. spacesailor
octave Posted just now Posted just now Well, we voted this morning. We were discussing the popularity of early voting, which a large percentage of the population seems to like. At the polling booth, there are signs listing the acceptable reasons for voting early. At no point were we asked if we were eligible. It seems to me that in practice, it doesn't matter. I think the days of having 1 day in which to vote are outdated. Given that many more people work on weekends these days, a voting window of one day seems a little restrictive. Rather than maintaining the fiction that voting early is only for people who would be overseas or otherwise unavailable to vote, perhaps the voting window could be one or two weeks, and political campaigns could cease before this voting period. I get the idea that significant announcements in this present campaign might be made after my vote, however, I don't tend to vote on individual promises that may or may not be kept anyway. I tend to vote on a candidate's philosophy. I am, and have always been, progressive, therefore, I am unlikely to vote for a party whose values are conservative.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now