Jump to content

Don't get me wrong here, But I LIKE Donald Trump.


Phil Perry

Recommended Posts

There was a Chinese businessman, Yun Chung Chang, who at 100 in 2018, had only just handed the CEO reins over to his son. He died in 2020 aged 102. There have been a number of American CEO's over 100.

 

But the current crop of aged U.S. politicians needs a good infusion of new blood. A lot of them just don't know when to go.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, onetrack said:

There was a Chinese businessman, Yun Chung Chang, who at 100 in 2018, had only just handed the CEO reins over to his son. He died in 2020 aged 102. There have been a number of American CEO's over 100.

 

But the current crop of aged U.S. politicians needs a good infusion of new blood. A lot of them just don't know when to go.

"it took me 60 years to get here and ill be damned if I hand it over before my time"

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Game over': Expert says Trump attorney just landed a 'bullseye for prosecutors'

 

ADonald Trump attorney provided damning evidence against the former president in the Mar-a-Lago documents case — and a legal analyst said it will almost certainly lead to a conviction once the case finally goes to trial.

 

ABC News reported that Trump attorney Jennifer Little told a grand jury that she "very clearly" warned the ex-president that he must comply with a federal subpoena for the classified documents he took home from the White House, and she's "absolutely" certain that he understood that failure to do so would be a "crime" — testimony that stunned CNN legal analyst Elie Honig Thursday.

 

"It's a bullseye for prosecutors and right down the middle of what they have to prove for obstruction of justice," Honig said.


"Let's remember that it's the federal Mar-a-Lago classified documents case, part of the indictment relates to the mishandling of classified documents, part of it relates to obstruction of justice.

 

"If you're a prosecutor and you have to prove obstruction, you have to show that the defendant, in this case Donald Trump, knew he had a subpoena, knew he had to comply and intentionally did not do so, and this witness, Trump's former and, by the way, current lawyer, has told the grand jury straight up, no ambiguity, 'You have to comply, if you don't, it's a crime,' and he said, 'I got it, I understand.'"

 

"If the jury accepts that," Honig added, "game over, he's guilty."

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The judge in that case, Aileen Cannon, is slowing the trial process to make sure it doesn’t start until after the election. She has already been criticised a couple of times by appellate courts for making rulings in Trump’s favour. It’s noteworthy that Trump has not said a word about her while calling every other judge he’s up against every name and slur he can think of. 

Edited by rgmwa
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Trump was the loser a lot of people say he is, we wouldn't even bother talking about him. The only reason half the world is taking notice of him is that there's a very real possibility he will be the next President of the United States. As it stands, he's the leading Republican contender and polling shows him in with a chance against Biden. Without all that, we could just forget about him.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For someone who's a compulsive liar, he's actually told the truth about his plans for a next term. Hopefully enough Americans may eventually believe what he says and vote against him, but half the country believes all his other lies.  Churchill said "You can always trust the Americans to do the right thing ........ after they've tried everything else".  Hopefully he's right or the next few years are going to get ugly and not just for the Americans. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sad part is the Democrats have no backup plan if Joe drops off the perch tomorrow. They should have a suitable replacement waiting in the wings. None of the current Democrat "potential leaders" have any "street cred".

Kamala Harris is a liability and the Democrats will go into a free-for-all bunfight, jockeying for positions, if anything happens to Joe.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...