octave Posted July 30, 2022 Author Posted July 30, 2022 (edited) 12 minutes ago, willedoo said: There might not be much metal that would be attracted to a magnet. A lot of aluminium and titanium, although there would probably be titanium/iron alloys as well. I was just about to say the same thing but after a quick consult with Professor Google I found this. A New Idea for Cleaning Up Space Debris: Magnets It is not using magnetism directly on the objects. Here is a link to the abstract from a scientific paper. Dexterous magnetic manipulation of conductive non-magnetic objects Edited July 30, 2022 by octave 1 3
willedoo Posted July 30, 2022 Posted July 30, 2022 Space junk article: https://www.grid.news/story/science/2022/07/29/the-long-march-5b-a-22-ton-chinese-rocket-is-falling-back-to-earth-this-weekend-where-will-it-land/ 1
octave Posted July 30, 2022 Author Posted July 30, 2022 Diamagnetism: How to Levitate a Frog Possible uses manipulating satellites (and frogs) 2 2
red750 Posted July 30, 2022 Posted July 30, 2022 Possible space junk landed in Snowy Monaro farmland. Story and pictures.
onetrack Posted July 30, 2022 Posted July 30, 2022 Red, I've already posted the story about the space junk landing on the farm in the Snowy Mts, yesterday evening (8 posts back).
red750 Posted July 30, 2022 Posted July 30, 2022 9 hours ago, onetrack said: Red, I've already posted the story Sorry OT. When the story came up on FB, I didn't check back thru the thread. 1
nomadpete Posted August 12, 2022 Posted August 12, 2022 (edited) Call me a cynic Or a sceptic Edited August 12, 2022 by nomadpete
Old Koreelah Posted August 22, 2022 Posted August 22, 2022 The death of one man stopped the Soviets from winning the Space Race. Sergei Korolev was behind almost everything the USSR did in space. His death in 1966 was a severe setback; the world has never seen another genius like him in the field of space flight. The plan was otherwise to have a manned landing in 1968; with Korolev still around and with proper funding, this would likely have succeeded. It would also have meant that there would have been a Moon base by the mid-70s and a manned Mars landing around 1980. The Soviet program could easily be scaled, since they planned to assemble modules in Earth orbit. The US program couldn’t—everything was designed to be lifted in one piece on a Saturn rocket. Final note: don’t let any Russians lay claim to Korolev; he was Ukrainian https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Korolev 2 1
octave Posted November 15, 2022 Author Posted November 15, 2022 Artemis 1 launch attempt for today (if all goes well) 3
facthunter Posted November 17, 2022 Posted November 17, 2022 A wild ride on top of an inferno. it's a wonder that much energy can be managed to drive a vehicle. Nev 2
onetrack Posted November 17, 2022 Posted November 17, 2022 Just look at those dreadful emissions levels! Oh the humanity! Won't anyone think of the children? And here we are, buying EV's to try and reduce emissions! 1
spacesailor Posted November 17, 2022 Posted November 17, 2022 Not as bad as those nuclear test explosions . the shear Huge amount of Air consumed each time . no wonder our atmosphere is getting a little " thin on top " . spacesailor 1
Jerry_Atrick Posted November 17, 2022 Posted November 17, 2022 So I can blame being a little thin on top on my nuclear days? 1
Old Koreelah Posted November 18, 2022 Posted November 18, 2022 Those blokes sent to fix the H2 leak must have had faith in the safety systems. Walking under those lethal rocket motors not long before they unleashed a firestorm that would kill anything nearby and deafen humans miles away. 1
facthunter Posted November 19, 2022 Posted November 19, 2022 Accidently going through a count-down and ignition is not a likely occurrence The AWE of the enormous energy would be there though. A wild ride on a sun temperature Fiery Maelstrom. Nev 1 1
octave Posted November 19, 2022 Author Posted November 19, 2022 These people are know as the "Red Crew" "Technicians who are part of the “red crew” of personnel specially trained to conduct operations at the launch pad during cryogenic loading operations have arrived at the launch pad. They will enter the zero deck or base of the mobile launcher to tighten connections to ensure a hydrogen valve used to replenish the core stage remains tight. NASA has historically sent teams to the pad to conduct inspections during active launch operations as needed." 1
octave Posted November 19, 2022 Author Posted November 19, 2022 The Red Crew with the head of NASA after launch Also a picture during the actual repair. 2
Jerry_Atrick Posted November 30, 2022 Posted November 30, 2022 Er.. what happens if they are lesbians.. or become them. 1
red750 Posted November 30, 2022 Posted November 30, 2022 Hi-jinx are OK, pregnancy not so much. No maternity wards on Mars. 2
Old Koreelah Posted November 30, 2022 Posted November 30, 2022 Spending a year or two outside our planet’s protective magnetic blanket exposes cosmonauts to increased radiation; someting we wouldn’t want for a developing foetus. 1 1
Marty_d Posted December 1, 2022 Posted December 1, 2022 There's a little snip you can have which will avoid the pregnancy issue if they wanted to include male astronauts. Nothing's perfect, but pair that with a condom and the pill, and it'd be a tenacious little foetus to get through that. Plus the morning after pill. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now