Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, spacesailor said:

AND, !

DISASTER 

spacesailor

 

Nope.   The prediction for a safe landing was 25%.    The successes of this test flight were the first launch, successfully reaching apogee the skydive maneuver and the flip back to the vertical and landing,  This was all achieved except the landing, due to a problem with the header tank.    It took many attempts before vertical landings of boosters was achieved and now it is routine.   Back in the early NASA days many rockets exploded  during launch.   For a private company space x has had huge achievements including providing NASA with the ability to transport astronauts the the international space station.  

Posted
Just now, spacesailor said:

AND, !

DISASTER .

I,ve just watched the "spaceX "r rocket explode !, while landing. On the TV news.

spacesailor

 

Space I watched it live and have been following it closely for many years.   The launch was a success.  The reaching of apogee 12.5 km was I believe achieved.    The skydive maneuver (a first) was achieved  the return to the area of the landing pad was achieved. the flip to the vertical was achieved. The safe landing was not achieved.   This rocket was not expected to survive this test.  It will be interesting to see if sn9 which is complete and ready to go will correct the header tank problem.  This is how science and technology advances

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I like the terminology they use. SN8 experienced an RUD (rapid unscheduled disassembly). Sounds a lot better than 'crashed'.

Edited by willedoo
  • Agree 1
Posted

Russian Mission Control has asked the cosmonauts aboard the ISS to try to find a leak in their module. A previous crack was found and fixed in August, but a second leak is proving harder to find. It's starting to deplete the station's reserve O2 supplies. A Progress cargo ship is scheduled to go up in February with the option of taking up more oxygen. Another option considered is using U.S. craft to deliver it if needed.

 

The old bird is wearing out. A lot of components were made with a certain shelf life in mind, but have spent many more years in service. It's due to retire in four years time, or possibly be pushed out to 2028. Due to it's age and condition, the Russians don't seem too interested in extending it longer than they have to. They're planning a Russian national station so are probably more inclined to concentrate finances and effort there. The Americans don't have much future interest there either, so we'll most likely see the end of it in the next few years.

Posted

Google tells me it's been continuously occupied for 20 years and 47 days.   Pretty bloody good for a collection of tin cans in an environment totally inimical to life.

The closest equivalent would be a submarine, and none of them stay submerged for 20 years!

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Press reports are saying that NASA will be significantly winding back it's mission in Russia now that U.S. Astronauts have their own means of transport. There's talk of the majority of staff in NASA's Moscow office losing their jobs and a decrease in staff levels at the Cosmonaut Training Centre. Although they won't be closing the mission, they'll reduce staff numbers and stop renting cottages for the Astronauts and their families.

 

It's also speculated that NASA will no longer have a permanent presence at the Institute of Medical and Biological Problems anymore and will only send its experts for separate consultations and meetings. The NASA mission in the Mission Control Center will remain almost unchanged.

 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Roscosmos has launched a Progress MS-16 robotic spacecraft to the ISS. One of it's jobs will be to deorbit the Russian docking module. Eventually in it's place will be the new science module and new docking module.

  • Informative 1
Posted
On 23/02/2021 at 8:24 PM, willedoo said:

It's getting busy up there. Perseverance and Curiosity roving around on the deck and the orbiters now with Chinese company. Matt Damon will be excited.

Spoiler alert - I think they ended up getting him back.

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...